2016
DOI: 10.1103/physreva.94.032331
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tunable entanglement resource in elastic electron-exchange collisions out of chaotic spin systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
19
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
1
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The spin-polarization parameters S(θ), U (θ) and T (θ)-the delicate scattering characteristics [2][3][4][5]-are used not only as battle probes for determining the accuracy of the model employed, but also play a critical role in understanding the spin-dependent interactions involved in the collision dynamics. Recently, it has been shown, in the works of Blum group [6,7] on e --H and Bartschat and Santos [8] on e --Li scattering, that spin-polarization S(θ), the Sherman function, arises also from the quantum spin-entanglement of the projectile-target system in addition to the separable total spin and Bell correlation, depending on the collision energy and scattering angle.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The spin-polarization parameters S(θ), U (θ) and T (θ)-the delicate scattering characteristics [2][3][4][5]-are used not only as battle probes for determining the accuracy of the model employed, but also play a critical role in understanding the spin-dependent interactions involved in the collision dynamics. Recently, it has been shown, in the works of Blum group [6,7] on e --H and Bartschat and Santos [8] on e --Li scattering, that spin-polarization S(θ), the Sherman function, arises also from the quantum spin-entanglement of the projectile-target system in addition to the separable total spin and Bell correlation, depending on the collision energy and scattering angle.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although these resonances would likely be washed out in practice due to the finite energy resolution (they are real, but not visible in Fig. 7 of [2], presumably due to the energy grid chosen in the calculations), it seems advisable to avoid the resonance regime from 3 eV up to the ionization threshold when choosing the energy. Figure 2 exhibits our results for a fixed energy of 3 eV as a function of the scattering angle.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In two recent publications, Blum and Lohmann [1] and Lohmann et al [2] discussed a tunable entanglement in elastic electron collisions with atomic hydrogen or light alkali atoms, where explicitly spin-dependent interactions may be neglected and the process is completely described by two independent parameters, namely the absolute angle-differential cross section (DCS) and a spin-correlation parameter P , which (except for the opposite sign) is the exchange asymmetry A ex that was measured by the Bielefeld [3,4] and NIST [5] groups many years ago. Due to the available experimental data, Lohmann et al [2] presented results for P = −A ex from various close-coupling calculations for atomic hydrogen and sodium, but only for selected energies as a function of the scattering angle, and for lithium, but only at selected angles as a function of energy.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations