“…Simpson et al [32] 1992 Foci of stromal invasion, maximum size not specified 5 1 (20) Solin et al [16] 1992 Invasion less than or equal 2 mm or comprising less than 10% of the tumour [45] 2003 1 focus or more foci, each less or equal to 1 mm 41 a 4 (9.7) Yang et al [46] 2003 1 focus or more foci, each less or equal to 1 mm 26 0 Buttarelli et al [47] 2004 1 focus or more foci, each less or equal to 1 mm 11 a 1 (9.1) Giard et al [48] 2005 1 focus or more foci, each less or equal to 1 mm 32 a 1 (1.1) Wilkie et al [49] 2005 1 focus or more foci, each less than 1 mm 51 a 7 (13.7) Katz et al [50] 2006 1 focus or more foci, each less or equal to 1 mm 21 a 2 (9.5) Leidenius et al [51] 2006 1 focus or more foci, each less or equal to 1 mm 11 a 1 (9.0) Gray et al [52] 2007 1 focus or more foci, each less or equal to 1 mm 81 a 6 (7.4) Le Bouedec et al [53] 2007 1 focus or more foci, each less or equal to 1 mm 40 a 4 (10%) Zavagno et al [54] 2007 1 focus or more foci, each less or equal to 1 mm 43 a 4 (9.3) a Series with sentinel lymph node biopsy 20% (9-11, 15-18, 31-54; Table 1). This wide range may be explained by both the different histopathological criteria used to define what constitutes microinvasion and the variable degrees of breast tissue sampling, but also it depends on the different techniques utilized to stain axillary lymph nodes (hematoxylin and eosin or IHC) especially after the introduction of sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy.…”