2023
DOI: 10.1038/s41416-023-02240-y
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tumour budding-based grading as independent prognostic biomarker in HPV-positive and HPV-negative head and neck cancer

Abstract: Background The prognostic significance of tumour budding (TB) and minimal cell nest size (MCNS) was shown in human papillomavirus (HPV)-negative head and neck squamous cell carcinomas (HNSCC). However, the optimisation of cutpoints, the prognostic impact in HPV-positive HNSCC, and the comparison with other histopathological grading systems are insufficiently investigated. Methods TB and MCNS were analysed digitally in 1 and 10 high-power fields (HPF) of 33… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, despite ITBCC recommended adopting a three-tier score system (low risk ≤4 buds; intermediate risk 5-9 buds; high risk ≥10 buds) to perform risk stratification, most of the studies discussed herein adopted a two-tier score system with a cut-off point of five buds (low risk <5 buds vs. high risk ≥5 buds), while only four studies maintained the three-tier score system. 34,44,56,60 Generally, the 5 buds cut-off seemed to be an appropriate discriminator to stratify patients; however, further studies are needed to validate these data. 20 The evaluation of TB in preoperative biopsies is an aspect less investigated in HNSCC.…”
Section: The Pathological Evaluation Of Tumor Budding In Hnsccmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Moreover, despite ITBCC recommended adopting a three-tier score system (low risk ≤4 buds; intermediate risk 5-9 buds; high risk ≥10 buds) to perform risk stratification, most of the studies discussed herein adopted a two-tier score system with a cut-off point of five buds (low risk <5 buds vs. high risk ≥5 buds), while only four studies maintained the three-tier score system. 34,44,56,60 Generally, the 5 buds cut-off seemed to be an appropriate discriminator to stratify patients; however, further studies are needed to validate these data. 20 The evaluation of TB in preoperative biopsies is an aspect less investigated in HNSCC.…”
Section: The Pathological Evaluation Of Tumor Budding In Hnsccmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The median number of patients per study was 150 (range 53-254 cases). Histopathological analysis was based on biopsies in 4 studies (11.1%), 38,[45][46][47] on surgical specimens in 30 (83.3%), [30][31][32][33][35][36][37][39][40][41][42][43][48][49][50][51][52][53][54][55][56][57][58][59][60][61][62][63][64] and mixed bioptic samples/surgical specimens in 2 (5.55%). 34,44 Major findings of the retrieved articles are discussed in dedicated paragraphs of section 4.…”
Section: Included Studies' Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations