2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2007.06.026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tumor size is of prognostic value in surgically treated FIGO stage II cervical cancer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

3
40
2

Year Published

2008
2008
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 92 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
3
40
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Horn et al reported that the lesion diameter >4 cm indicated a poor prognosis, and Plante et al reported that the lesion diameter >2 cm had a high risk of recurrence (Horn et al, 2007;Plante et al, 2011). In this study, subjects were divided into three groups based on the maximum diameter of tumors: <2 cm, 2-4 cm, 4 cm.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Horn et al reported that the lesion diameter >4 cm indicated a poor prognosis, and Plante et al reported that the lesion diameter >2 cm had a high risk of recurrence (Horn et al, 2007;Plante et al, 2011). In this study, subjects were divided into three groups based on the maximum diameter of tumors: <2 cm, 2-4 cm, 4 cm.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…The treatment approach of cervical cancer depends on the stage and tumour size, age of the patient and comorbidities (Balkin, 2007;Horn et al, 2007). Usually, the standard first line treatments used are radiation therapy (RT), surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy with RT (Balkin, 2007;Ferlay et al, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…and treatment related factors (5,(10)(11)(12). In this study clinical, histopathologic and socio-demographic factor were analyzed to assess their prognostic significance.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many investigators have emphasized the importance of patient characteristics (age, and anemia), tumor (stage, size, lymph node, and grade) and treatment factors (treatment modality, irradiation technique, dose, and duration) and indicated influence on outcome (10)(11)(12)(13)(14).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%