2014
DOI: 10.1089/ars.2013.5462
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tumor-Selective, Futile Redox Cycle-Induced Bystander Effects Elicited by NQO1 Bioactivatable Radiosensitizing Drugs in Triple-Negative Breast Cancers

Abstract: β-Lap showed NQO1-dependent efficacy against two triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) xenografts. NQO1 expression variations in human breast cancer patient samples were noted, where ~60% cancers over-expressed NQO1, with little or no expression in associated normal tissue. Differential DNA damage and lethality were noted in NQO1(+) versus NQO1-deficient (NQO1(-)) TNBC cells and xenografts after β-lap treatment. β-Lap-treated NQO1(+) cells died by programmed necrosis, whereas co-cultured NQO1(-) TNBC cells exhi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
55
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
(111 reference statements)
1
55
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The β-lap concentration dependence of the signal change was investigated across three specific concentrations: a dose typically lethal to cancer cells (2.5 μM, such as MCF-7 breast cancer cells (Wuerzberger et al 1998; Cao et al 2014), a dose at the threshold of activity (1.0 μM), and at an order of magnitude below this in vivo activity threshold (0.10 μM). Each concentration was measured against a drug-free control on the chip and normalized against the nonspecific change, ( C - D )/ C , where C is the change associated with the drug free control and D is the change associated with the drug-treated electrodes.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The β-lap concentration dependence of the signal change was investigated across three specific concentrations: a dose typically lethal to cancer cells (2.5 μM, such as MCF-7 breast cancer cells (Wuerzberger et al 1998; Cao et al 2014), a dose at the threshold of activity (1.0 μM), and at an order of magnitude below this in vivo activity threshold (0.10 μM). Each concentration was measured against a drug-free control on the chip and normalized against the nonspecific change, ( C - D )/ C , where C is the change associated with the drug free control and D is the change associated with the drug-treated electrodes.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To investigate this effect, we performed two experiments with catalase, one with relatively low levels of catalase (10 activity units/ml, 0.0030 nmol/ml, 3.0 nM) and high levels of NQO1 (50 nM), consistent with cancerous cells, and another one with high levels of catalase (100 activity units/ml, 0.030 nmol/ml, 30 nM) and lower levels of NQO1 (5 nM), representative of a healthy cell. These ratios were selected from the relative expression levels of these enzymes from repeated trials of solid tumors (Bey et al 2007; Cao et al 2014; Chakrabarti et al 2015a; Dong et al 2007; Huang et al 2012, 2013; Moore et al 2015). Each experiment was conducted along with a drug-free control.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations