2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.clcc.2017.06.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tumor Regression Grade After Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation and Surgery for Low Rectal Cancer Evaluated by Multiple Correspondence Analysis: Ten Years as Minimum Follow-up

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
17
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
3
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this respect, researches suggested different boundaries. For the Mandard TRG, some studies supported that TRG 1-2 should be classified into responders, which was in accordance with our study [7,18,19], while some others believed that TRG 1-3 was better in distinguishing the prognosis [20][21][22]. For the Becker TRG, there were studies supporting the same consequence as ours [1,[23][24][25], while others suggested TRG 1-2 owned a better prognosis than TRG 3 [9,10,26,27].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…In this respect, researches suggested different boundaries. For the Mandard TRG, some studies supported that TRG 1-2 should be classified into responders, which was in accordance with our study [7,18,19], while some others believed that TRG 1-3 was better in distinguishing the prognosis [20][21][22]. For the Becker TRG, there were studies supporting the same consequence as ours [1,[23][24][25], while others suggested TRG 1-2 owned a better prognosis than TRG 3 [9,10,26,27].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…The diagnosis of mucinous adenocarcinoma was based on the pre-treatment biopsy specimen as mucin seen in the resection specimen may have been due to the effects of treatment. The Mandard tumor regression grading score was used to assess response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (14). For all cases identified we performed a cross check with our biobank to ensure that there was fresh frozen tissue available for both normal rectum and tumor.…”
Section: Patient Cohortmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In rectal cancer the clinical stage at diagnosis is a factor for prognosis of survival to 5 years, being for stage II from 60% to 75% and for stage III from 40% to 60%. Treatment with neoadjuvant chemo-radiotherapy produces a wide range of responses in the tumour, the best responding patients having the better prognosis, above all those who achieve the pathologic complete response (pCR) [11][12][13]. There are a number of systems used to classify the responses, the Ryan system published in 2005 being that used by the American College of Pathologists (Table 1) [14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%