2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.bmc.2004.07.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tumor promoter binding of the protein kinase C C1 homology domain peptides of RasGRPs, chimaerins, and Unc13s

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
44
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
3
44
0
Order By: Relevance
“…S3A). Among them, RasGRP3 was the most likely candidate because RasGRP3, but not RasGRP1, is capable of activating Rap1 (16) and RasGRP2 is unresponsive to TPA (33). We therefore knocked down RasGRP3 expression by using siRNAs and examined Rap1 activity in TPA-stimulated cells.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…S3A). Among them, RasGRP3 was the most likely candidate because RasGRP3, but not RasGRP1, is capable of activating Rap1 (16) and RasGRP2 is unresponsive to TPA (33). We therefore knocked down RasGRP3 expression by using siRNAs and examined Rap1 activity in TPA-stimulated cells.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These two observations rule out the possibility that the lack of translocation of these GAPs during anti-CD3-mediated TCR signaling could be due to the lack of DAG generation or, alternatively, to artifacts derived from the use of overexpressed proteins. Given that the isolated C1 domains of α2-and β2-chimaerin show affinities to DAG analogs similar or even higher than C1 domains of PKCs and RasGRP1 [32,33,60], we believe that the differential behavior of these GAPs is probably a reflection of the high-energy cost required for releasing the auto-inhibitory structure of chimaerins [56]. This interpretation is consistent with the observation that β2-chimaerin requires in vivo ≈100-fold higher doses of PMA than PKCα for its effective translocation to cellular membranes [34].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For PKC␣, the K i of 130C037 (343 Ϯ 35 nM) was 4-fold weaker than that for PKC␦ (91 Ϯ 16 nM), but its affinity for the better binding C1 domain, ␣C1a (610 Ϯ 170 nM), was 350-fold weaker than that for ␦C1b (1.78 Ϯ 0.51 nM). Although the analysis of structure activity relations for the binding of ligands to isolated C1 domains, as so elegantly done by Irie et al (14,24,33), should continue to be informative, particularly for identifying positive interactions, great caution should be exercised in interpreting negative results.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a simplified example, the addition of extra positively charged residues at the end of the C1 domain, in a position where they will not affect the direct interaction of ligand with the binding cleft but where they can affect charged interactions with the negatively charged phospholipids, had a substantial effect on the measured binding affinity (33). In the intact PKC, moreover, multiple domains contribute to the membrane interaction, including the pseudosubstrate region, the C1 domains, and Ca 2ϩ -C2 domain complex.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%