2001
DOI: 10.1165/ajrcmb.25.1.4472
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tumor Necrosis Factor–Related Apoptosis-Inducing Ligand and Chemotherapy Cooperate to Induce Apoptosis in Mesothelioma Cell Lines

Abstract: Tumor necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL) can induce apoptosis in certain tumor cells. In addition, TRAIL and chemotherapy can act cooperatively, possibly as a result of chemotherapy-induced increases in expression of a TRAIL receptor, DR5. We used cell lines derived from a highly chemoresistant tumor, malignant mesothelioma, to learn whether TRAIL was effective alone or together with chemotherapy and whether cooperativity depended on increases in DR5 expression. TRAIL (codons 95-285) was… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

7
65
0
1

Year Published

2002
2002
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 75 publications
(73 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
7
65
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The importance of activation of both types of signalling in sensitisation of cancer cells to TRAIL has been recently shown for prostate cancer cells (Ray and Almasan, 2003). Our findings are in accord to those of Liu et al, 2001, reporting that sensitisation of MM cells toward TRAIL by chemotherapeutic is dependent on the mitochondrial pathway, in a c-Jun N-terminal kinase (JNK)-dependent manner (Vivo et al, 2003). Thus, a-TOS, although also acting via the JNK pathway (Yu et al, 2001) signalling downstream through Bax (Lei et al, 2002), promotes the receptor-dependent pathway, thereby maximizing the apoptotic potential of the cell.…”
supporting
confidence: 91%
“…The importance of activation of both types of signalling in sensitisation of cancer cells to TRAIL has been recently shown for prostate cancer cells (Ray and Almasan, 2003). Our findings are in accord to those of Liu et al, 2001, reporting that sensitisation of MM cells toward TRAIL by chemotherapeutic is dependent on the mitochondrial pathway, in a c-Jun N-terminal kinase (JNK)-dependent manner (Vivo et al, 2003). Thus, a-TOS, although also acting via the JNK pathway (Yu et al, 2001) signalling downstream through Bax (Lei et al, 2002), promotes the receptor-dependent pathway, thereby maximizing the apoptotic potential of the cell.…”
supporting
confidence: 91%
“…The results shown are from a single experiment performed in triplicate. 35 In contrast, lower concentrations of doxorubicin, which were sufficient to sensitize cells to TRAIL, did not result in elevation of TRAIL receptor expression 29,36 or changes in receptor mRNA levels that correlated with sensitivity. 13 Therefore, changes in TRAIL receptor status following doxorubicin treatment may vary with the concentration or cell type studied.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Although most of the toxicity was attributed to doxorubicin, two other studies using breast and mesothelial cells have demonstrated lack of selectivity for malignant cells when doxorubicin was combined with TRAIL. 13,29 It is important to note that the recombinant TRAIL used in this study contains a histidinetag, which has been shown to have different biochemical and toxicological properties than TRAIL /Apo2L.0. 10 However, in the prostate cancer cell lines, we have tested noncross -linked TRAIL lacking a tag ( PeproTech ) with results comparable to those achieved with the histidine -tagged TRAIL purchased from R&D systems (Voelkel -Johnson, unpublished observations ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the same vein, recent reports show significant augmentation of proapoptotic gene therapy by pharmacological downregulation of survival signals in MM cells Mohiuddin et al, 2001). Furthermore, both tumour necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand and chemotherapy cooperate to induce apoptosis in HMCLs (Liu et al, 2001). In conclusion, HMCLs exhibited different responses to gradiation exposure.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%