Chaos and Fractals 1998
DOI: 10.1016/b978-044450002-1/50004-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tumor growth simulation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Additionally, the predictions agree with the current literature. Furthermore, the results of the parametric study agree with data presented by Duechting (1990), Duechting et al (1995), Kocher and Treuer (1995), Kocher et al (2000) and Steel (2002, p 158-68).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Additionally, the predictions agree with the current literature. Furthermore, the results of the parametric study agree with data presented by Duechting (1990), Duechting et al (1995), Kocher and Treuer (1995), Kocher et al (2000) and Steel (2002, p 158-68).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…The discrete state simulation model introduced by Duechting (1990) and Duechting et al (1995) is based on a consideration of the distinct phases of the cell cycle, but this tumour behaviour model concerns only the in vitro case or the early avascular stages of small in vivo tumours. Kocher and Treuer (1995) and Kocher et al (2000) presented a simulation model of the development of a tumour spheroid and its response to radiosurgery.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, single-cell-based models provide such a description and allow for a more realistic stochastic approach at both the cellular and subcellular levels. Several different discrete models of tumour growth have been developed recently, including cellular automata models [1,31,33,46,65,74,85], Potts models [45,82,88], lattice free cell-centered models [32] or agent-based models [92]. For a review on many different single-cell-based models applied to tumour growth and other biological problems please see [9].…”
Section: Modelling Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Continuum and solid-mechanics models (Chaplain and Sleeman, 1993; Tracqui, 1995; Khain and Sander, 2006; Macklin and Lowengrub, 2007; Frieboes et al , 2007; Li et al , 2007; Swanson et al , 2003) consider physical pressures and forces among cells and TM, capturing tumor structure at the tissue level, but do not describe a tumor's cellular and subcellular properties, making mechanisms such as cell-cell adhesion difficult to include. Point-cell models ( cellular automata ) allow more realistic stochastic descriptions at cellular (Kimmel and Axelrod, 1991; Smolle and Stettner, 1993; Qi et al , 1993; Kansal et al , 2000; Dormann and Deutsch, 2002) and subcellular levels (Düchting, 1990; Düchting et al , 1996) but neglect the shapes of cells. Hybrid multi-cell models combine discrete representations of individual tumor cells with continuum representations of diffusible chemicals (Anderson, 2005; Rejniak, 2005) and either discrete, continuum or hybrid models of the surrounding tissue.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%