2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2020.10.034
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tumor Control Probability of Radiosurgery and Fractionated Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Brain Metastases

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
115
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 82 publications
(119 citation statements)
references
References 90 publications
3
115
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…SRS is an important, minimally invasive strategy for patients with newly diagnosed or recurrent metastatic cancer to the brain, with local brain tumor control rates at one year after SRS that vary between 80 to 95% [9][10][11]. Compared to conventional WBRT, SRS results in improved local tumor control, long-term survival, and neurocognition preservation in patients with metastatic melanoma [12].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SRS is an important, minimally invasive strategy for patients with newly diagnosed or recurrent metastatic cancer to the brain, with local brain tumor control rates at one year after SRS that vary between 80 to 95% [9][10][11]. Compared to conventional WBRT, SRS results in improved local tumor control, long-term survival, and neurocognition preservation in patients with metastatic melanoma [12].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Minniti et al analyzed the clinical outcome of 289 patients with large (> 2.0 cm) BM who received SRS or FSRT, with the results revealing that FSRT showed a better 1-year cumulative local control rate (91% versus 77%, P = 0.01) and a reduced risk of RN (8% versus 20%, P = 0.004) [ 20 ]. On the other hand, it has been reported that stereotactic radiotherapy alone deteriorates local control rate as the tumor size increases [ 21 , 22 ]. A recent systematic review estimates the 2-year local control rate of 69% for large (31–40 mm) BM treated with FSRT (30 Gy in five fractions) [ 22 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Data on Tumor Control Probability (TCP), considered as the probability of LC ( 30 ) and Normal Tissue Complication Probability (NTCP), considered as the risk of RN ( 31 ), were recently published as Organ-Specific Papers from the international collaborative project “HYTEC” (Hypofractionated Treatment Effects in the Clinic), to guide dose and fractionation choices for SRS/SRT in BMs. The authors concluded that single-fraction SRS with doses of 18-24 Gy should be the first choice for tumors ≤ 2 cm, guaranteeing an estimated LC of 85%-95% at 12 months, while SRT should be preferred for lesion >2 cm ( 30 ). The risk of RN is modeled on dose/volume parameters.…”
Section: Upfront Focal Rtmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The prescribed dose of SRT usually ranges 24-30 Gy in 3-5 fractions in the published series ( 41 , 46 ). Based on the available data, the HYTEC TCP and NTCP papers provide useful indications on doses and constraints to orientate in the clinical practice, as previously done for the radical and upfront setting ( 30 , 31 ). The validation of these results in a randomized setting are awaited from the ongoing Alliance trial (NCT04114981), which is randomizing ≥2 cm-sized-operated brain lesions with post-surgical cavities smaller than 5 cm to be irradiated with single fraction SRS or 3-5 fractions SRT ( Table 1 ).…”
Section: Rt Complementary To Surgerymentioning
confidence: 99%