1990
DOI: 10.1002/1097-0142(19900415)65:8<1801::aid-cncr2820650822>3.0.co;2-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tumor cells in intraoperative pleural lavage. An indicator for the poor prognosis of bronchogenic carcinoma

Abstract: Fifty-nine patients with bronchogenic carcinoma and 21 patients with nonneoplastic lung diseases underwent intraoperative pleural lavage with 300-ml physiologic saline before (Lavage I) and after resection (Lavage II). The presence of tumor cells in the lavage fluid was established cytologically in 29 patients with bronchogenic carcinoma. Twenty-seven had positive findings in Lavage I and 23 of these also in Lavage II. Two patients had positive findings in Lavage II only. All controls were negative. In all 40%… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

2
17
1

Year Published

1993
1993
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
2
17
1
Order By: Relevance
“…After independent review, 24 publications dealing with prognostic value of PLC in patients with lung cancer were considered to be eligible for inclusion in the analysis . Of these publications, one was excluded because it did not allow the calculation of HR [26], four were excluded because no survival data in negative PLC group were available [6,[27][28][29], three were excluded because the same authors published several reports on the same patients, and only the best-quality study was considered [30][31][32], three were excluded because they did not provide sufficient data to perform a quantitative aggregation [5,33,34]. Subsequently, 15 articles [11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25] were available for analysis of the PLC prognostic significance; the clinical characteristics of these studies, along with ELCWP scores, are outlined in Table 1, and the ELCWP scores in detail are shown in Appendix Table 1 (provided in supplemental material on the Web).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After independent review, 24 publications dealing with prognostic value of PLC in patients with lung cancer were considered to be eligible for inclusion in the analysis . Of these publications, one was excluded because it did not allow the calculation of HR [26], four were excluded because no survival data in negative PLC group were available [6,[27][28][29], three were excluded because the same authors published several reports on the same patients, and only the best-quality study was considered [30][31][32], three were excluded because they did not provide sufficient data to perform a quantitative aggregation [5,33,34]. Subsequently, 15 articles [11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25] were available for analysis of the PLC prognostic significance; the clinical characteristics of these studies, along with ELCWP scores, are outlined in Table 1, and the ELCWP scores in detail are shown in Appendix Table 1 (provided in supplemental material on the Web).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…So, pleural lavage performed before lung resection can be used to identify whether tumor cells spread in pleural cavity. Buhr et al argued that significant correlation was found between positive pleural lavage cytology before resection and pleural invasion [20]. Nagawara et al also had similar findings and argued that in cases with positive cytology there is an increase of risk of pleural invasion and recurrence [21].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Three recent studies have examined the predictive value of preresectional pleural lavage in patients without an effusion. In 1990, Buhr and associates [3] studied 59 patients undergoing curative resection for primary lung cancer. They identified a 45.7% positivity: 39.5% in stage I, 50% in stage II, and 71.4% in stage III.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%