1982
DOI: 10.1007/bf01805873
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tumor cell proliferation and sequential chemotherapy after partial tumor resection in C3H/HeJ mammary tumors

Abstract: SummaryChanges in tumor cell proliferation and chemosensitivity after partial (up to 3/4) surgical resection were studied in C3H/HeJ mammary tumors, In all studies surgical cytoreduction stimulated tumor cell proliferation in the residual tumor, as evidenced by increases in the 3H-TdR labelling index between 24 and 72 hrs after surgery. The time of maximal proliferative activity was directly related to the amount of tumor removed. In spontaneous mammary tumors, proliferative recovery after 1/2 resection could … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0
1

Year Published

1984
1984
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
6
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the local treatment group had a significantly worse distant progression-free survival, resulting in no difference in OS between the two groups. This was correlated to the treatment-provoked growth of a metastatic tumor after local treatments to the primary site 27–29 . In this study, patients were treated with systemic chemotherapy before randomization, and only responsive patients were enrolled.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…However, the local treatment group had a significantly worse distant progression-free survival, resulting in no difference in OS between the two groups. This was correlated to the treatment-provoked growth of a metastatic tumor after local treatments to the primary site 27–29 . In this study, patients were treated with systemic chemotherapy before randomization, and only responsive patients were enrolled.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Moreover, the 2-year overall survival was 41.9% in the locoregional treatment and 43% in the no-locoregional treatment, and, furthermore, only 18% of patients who had undergone locoregional treatment required palliative surgery [ 19 ]. Finally, they found a reduction of progression-free survival in the group that had undergone locoregional treatment, hypothesizing that this was determined by the growth of the metastatic tumor as a result of the removal of the primary tumor, as showed by other preclinical studies [ 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 ]. The authors concluded that they did not find any evidence to support the use of surgical locoregional treatment to improve overall survival in MBC patients who responded to first-line chemotherapy and suggested not to consider this procedure in routine practice.…”
Section: Breast Surgery In Mbc: Where Are We Now?mentioning
confidence: 82%
“…5. Tümör mikroçevrede cerrahi travma sonucu büyüme faktörlerinin salgılanması hipotezi Coffey ve ark (21)'larının yayınladıkları derlemede postoperatif immünsupresyon, cerrahi sırasında tümör hücrelerinin dolaşıma katılması, lipopolisakkaritlerin etkisiyle proenflamatuar cevabın oluşması ve dolaşımda interlökin 6, VEGF ve TNF alfa salınması, anjiojenik değişim gibi faktörlerin biri veya kombinasyonunun primer tümörün çıkarılmasından sonra metastazların büyümesine katkı yapabileceği ifade edilmektedir (18,19,(21)(22)(23). Primer tümör genellikle ekstrasellüler matriks proteaz, glikojenaz, proanjiojenetik faktörler, enflamatuar ve anjiojenetik mediyatörler üretmekte ve böylece mikroçevrede değişime neden olmaktadır.…”
Section: Genetik Onarma [Innovation] Modeliunclassified