Tumblr is Queer and Twitter is Toxic: Speculating About the Vibe of Social Media Spaces

Kender, Kay

doi:10.1145/3546155.3547279

Cited by 4 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 12 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…In contrast, introducing video recording devices into physical meetings is cumbersome and can make people uncomfortable. Furthermore, it was found that the type of software used either increased or reduced the likelihood of data sharing due to its internal logics, customs, or vibe [ 54 ]. With Discord, it is not customary to use a real profile photo; in most instances, people use an avatar, and it did not feel natural to turn the webcam on.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Remote Inclusion of Vulnerable Users in mHealth Intervention Design: Retrospective Case Analysis

Straand,

Baxter,

Følstad

2024

JMIR Mhealth Uhealth

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background:The COVID-19 pandemic served as a catalyst for innovation in remote user-centered research methods, particularly through an extended use of video conferencing such as Zoom for remote user involvement.Objective: This paper aims to explore opportunities and considerations that emerged from involving vulnerable user groups remotely in designing behavioral and psychological interventions.Methods: A retrospective case analysis was conducted using a reflection-on-action approach. Remote user-centered research practices from two projects were examined, involving vulnerable populations in Norway and Australia. These projects engaged low-income/unemployed groups in synchronous user-based evaluation and testing to develop interactive and web-based behavioral interventions. Visual mapping and reflection-on-action revealed opportunities and considerations of adopting remote participatory research with vulnerable users.Results: Lessons learned for future research were identified as 1) Reduced barriers to research inclusion, 2) Digital literacy transition, 3) Contextualized insights: A window into people's lives, 4) Seamless enactment of roles and 5) Increased flexibility for researchers and participants. Conclusions:Our findings contribute knowledge on research practices that underwent substantial change during COVID-19. The analysis shows that maturing technologies and increased participant and researcher experience alleviated initial challenges. Remote methods facilitated recruitment, eased the burden of research participation, and provided a rich and relevant environment for user-centered evaluation. Unexpected benefits were found, including improved power balance between researchers and vulnerable participants as participants gained more control. The development of support procedures and tools for remote testing will be crucial to fully capitalize on efficiency gains and protect participants' privacy.

show abstract

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Remote Inclusion of Vulnerable Users in mHealth Intervention Design: Retrospective Case Analysis

Straand,

Baxter,

Følstad

2024

JMIR Mhealth Uhealth

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Such an investigation might compare social schemata of different sociocultural communities and explore their role in the collective sensemaking of risk. This extends to the digital sphere, where varying norms and social dynamics govern different platforms (Gillespie, 2018; Kender, 2022; Mellon & Prosser, 2017). In addition, future research could incorporate the concept of facework to explore the interplay between sociocultural backgrounds and the specific forms of risk communication that pose a threat to recipients' self‐perceptions.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Risk perception and interpersonal discussion on risk: A systematic literature review

Perlstein

2023

Risk Analysis

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Risk perception research has long been attentive to the fact that risk is a social construction. Nevertheless, this fact has not been integrated into empirical research in any systematic manner. Empirical studies that do focus on the social construction of risk often do so from very different positions and with different objectives in mind. Interpersonal discussion, while considered an important medium of social construction, is rarely given consideration. This systematic literature review aims to provide a coherent foundation for empirical studies of interpersonal discussion on risk. Specifically, it summarizes existing research into the reciprocal relationship between interpersonal discussion on risk and individual‐level risk perception. The systematic literature review adheres to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews (PRISMA) guidelines. A total of 843 unique articles were identified, of which 60 are included in the review. A majority of the articles in the corpus found a positive association between interpersonal discussion on risk and risk perception. This association, however, lacks robustness, especially in terms of the direction of causality. Three theoretical interpretations of the relationship are found in the corpus: (1) interpersonal discussion as a conduit for risk information, (2) risk perception as shared social schemata, and (3) interpersonal discussion on risk as a facilitator of similarity between network members. Implications for future research are discussed. This literature review concludes with six guiding principles for future research into the interpersonal discussion–risk perception relationship.

show abstract

Personalised But Impersonal: Listeners' Experiences of Algorithmic Curation on Music Streaming Services

Freeman

Gibbs

Nansen

2023

Proceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Tumblr is Queer and Twitter is Toxic: Speculating About the Vibe of Social Media Spaces

Cited by 4 publications

References 12 publications

Remote Inclusion of Vulnerable Users in mHealth Intervention Design: Retrospective Case Analysis

Remote Inclusion of Vulnerable Users in mHealth Intervention Design: Retrospective Case Analysis

Risk perception and interpersonal discussion on risk: A systematic literature review

Personalised But Impersonal: Listeners' Experiences of Algorithmic Curation on Music Streaming Services

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About