1984
DOI: 10.1016/s0190-9622(84)70221-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tubular apocrine adenoma with perineural invasion

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

2
17
0

Year Published

1991
1991
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
2
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Both tumors have many histological similarities; in fact they have been regarded as identical by some authors [ 19,20]. In our case, however, the luminal cells did not show decapitation secretion, and there was no connection with the overlying epidermis, features considered typical of TAA [21]. Carcinocmbryonic antigen and epithelial membrane antigen arc not suitable for differentiating PEA from TA A, since both react with either eccrine or apocrine glands, although they are useful to specify the glandular nature of the tissue.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 44%
“…Both tumors have many histological similarities; in fact they have been regarded as identical by some authors [ 19,20]. In our case, however, the luminal cells did not show decapitation secretion, and there was no connection with the overlying epidermis, features considered typical of TAA [21]. Carcinocmbryonic antigen and epithelial membrane antigen arc not suitable for differentiating PEA from TA A, since both react with either eccrine or apocrine glands, although they are useful to specify the glandular nature of the tissue.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 44%
“…[6] The finding of a tubular apocrine adenoma in a female of middle age in our case is in concordance with what others have reported. [1][2][3][4][5][6][7]10,12,[14][15][16][17][18] Tubular apocrine adenoma is found most commonly on the scalp but lesions have also been described at a variety of other sites including the face, [6] eyelid, [18] axilla, [3] leg and genitalia. [4,11,17] However, Lee et al reported a case in the external auditory canal.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The relatively limited number of reported cases has posed hindrance to complete understanding of this tumor but this is a rare tumor that the pathologist should be aware of and consider within their differential diagnosis as there is some tendency for perineural invasion. [16] …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A connection to the epidermis or infundibulum has often been demonstrated in published cases of TA, yet these lesions were variously interpreted as PEA or TAA, not as SCAP. [1][2][3]9,14,[18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28] Connection of the tumors to the infundibulum has been used by some authorities as an argument to support apocrine differentiation. 2,3 One of the observers diagnosed a lesion in this series as SCAP even if it exhibited a single focus in which glandular elements were in continuity to the follicular infundibulum (Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%