2014
DOI: 10.5012/bkcs.2014.35.6.1891
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tuberostemonine O from the Roots of Stemona tuberosa

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
(6 reference statements)
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Consequently, the absolute configuration of compound 27 was established as 3R, 9R, 9aR, 14S, 16S, and named dehydrocroomine B. By comparing 1D NMR data, dehydrostenine A (3) (Dong et al, 2017), dehydrostenine B (4) (Dong et al, 2017), neotuberostemonol (5) (Jiang et al, 2002), tuberostemonine D (6) (Pilli and Ferreira de Oliveira, 2000), tuberostemonine O (7) (Kil et al, 2014), 15α-didehydrotuberostemonine (8) (Lin and Fu, 1999), 9α-bisdehydrotuberostemonine (9) (Lin et al, 2008), isodidehydrotuberostemonine (10) (Lin et al, 2008), 15βdidehydrotuberostemonine (11) (Yue et al, 2014), didehydrotuberostemonine A (12) (Hu et al, 2009), tuberostemoline ( 14) (Lin et al, 2008), stemonatuberone C (15) (Yue et al, 2014), bisdehydrostemoninine (18) (Lin et al, 2006), stichoneurine E (19) (Park et al, 2013), tuberostemoamide (20) (Hou et al, 2019), stemona-lactam S (21) (Dong et al, 2017), stemona-Lactam O (22) (Jiang et al, 2002), stemoninine A (23) (Wang et al, 2008), tuberostemospiroline (25) (Hu et al, 2019), dehydrocroomine (28) (Lin et al, 2008), and sessilistemonamine C (29) (Wang et al, 2007) were proved to be known compounds.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, the absolute configuration of compound 27 was established as 3R, 9R, 9aR, 14S, 16S, and named dehydrocroomine B. By comparing 1D NMR data, dehydrostenine A (3) (Dong et al, 2017), dehydrostenine B (4) (Dong et al, 2017), neotuberostemonol (5) (Jiang et al, 2002), tuberostemonine D (6) (Pilli and Ferreira de Oliveira, 2000), tuberostemonine O (7) (Kil et al, 2014), 15α-didehydrotuberostemonine (8) (Lin and Fu, 1999), 9α-bisdehydrotuberostemonine (9) (Lin et al, 2008), isodidehydrotuberostemonine (10) (Lin et al, 2008), 15βdidehydrotuberostemonine (11) (Yue et al, 2014), didehydrotuberostemonine A (12) (Hu et al, 2009), tuberostemoline ( 14) (Lin et al, 2008), stemonatuberone C (15) (Yue et al, 2014), bisdehydrostemoninine (18) (Lin et al, 2006), stichoneurine E (19) (Park et al, 2013), tuberostemoamide (20) (Hou et al, 2019), stemona-lactam S (21) (Dong et al, 2017), stemona-Lactam O (22) (Jiang et al, 2002), stemoninine A (23) (Wang et al, 2008), tuberostemospiroline (25) (Hu et al, 2019), dehydrocroomine (28) (Lin et al, 2008), and sessilistemonamine C (29) (Wang et al, 2007) were proved to be known compounds.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This herbal medicine was traditionally used as an antitussive and insecticidal drug in Asia [ 1 ]. Previous phytochemical reports on S. tuberosa mention alkaloids [ 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 ], stilbenoids [ 6 , 7 ], phenanthrene [ 7 ], and some minor dehydrotocopherol derivatives as isomer mixtures containing δ-tocopherol [ 8 ]. The alkaloids and stilbenoids were reported as the antitussive [ 2 , 3 , 4 ] and antibacterial agents [ 7 ] while the dehydrotocopherol derivatives exhibited antioxidant activities [ 8 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Surprisingly, structure 1 had been previously assigned to tuberostemonine O, which was first isolated from S. tuberosa by Kil et al in 2014 and obtained in the present work. Given their inconsistent NMR data (Table ), the structure of tuberostemonine P was confirmed by X-ray crystallography, whereas that of tuberostemonine O was established exclusively on spectroscopic grounds; as a result, it became clear that the claimed structure of tuberostemonine O needed to be revised.…”
mentioning
confidence: 54%
“…Finally, the single-crystal X-ray diffraction results (Figure 2) corroborated the above deduced structure of 1, which was given the trivial name tuberostemonine P, and permitted the a s s i g n m e n t o f i t s a b s o l u t e c o n fi g u r a t i o n a s (1R,3S,9R,9aS,10R,11S,12S,13S,18S,20S) [Flack parameter: 0.05 (13)]. 11 Surprisingly, structure 1 had been previously assigned to tuberostemonine O, 12 which was first isolated from S. tuberosa by Kil et al in 2014 and obtained in the present work. Given their inconsistent NMR data (Table 1), the structure of tuberostemonine P was confirmed by X-ray crystallography, whereas that of tuberostemonine O was established exclusively on spectroscopic grounds; as a result, it became clear that the claimed structure of tuberostemonine O needed to be revised.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%