2013
DOI: 10.5588/ijtld.12.0934
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tuberculosis screening for long-term care: a cost-effectiveness analysis

Abstract: Our findings suggest that TB screening strategies on entry to long-term care are costly, with large numbers needed to screen. Screening with TST was more cost-effective than chest X-ray screening. Higher risk of reactivation of LTBI is associated with improved cost-effectiveness of screening. Short time horizons and test performance characteristics place limitations on screening programmes in this setting. Future considerations include the changing demographics of the institutionalised elderly.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

1
31
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The latter is also called active case-finding (ACF). Screening for LTBI relies on the measurement of cellular responses to TB antigens, either by tuberculin skin test (TST) [6, 13, 1928, 30, 32] or Interferon-Gamma Release Assay (IGRA) [6, 2628, 31]. For ACF, chest X-ray (CXR) is mainly adopted such as in contact investigation or in combination with annual health screening program.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The latter is also called active case-finding (ACF). Screening for LTBI relies on the measurement of cellular responses to TB antigens, either by tuberculin skin test (TST) [6, 13, 1928, 30, 32] or Interferon-Gamma Release Assay (IGRA) [6, 2628, 31]. For ACF, chest X-ray (CXR) is mainly adopted such as in contact investigation or in combination with annual health screening program.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the elderly, owing to few opportunity in receiving Bacillus Calmette-Guerin (BCG) vaccination in their childhood and various immunologic response, multiple cut-offs are therefore recommended to give the best predictive values under different clinical and epidemiologic situations [6, 13, 19]. Factors such as separate test-reading visit, potential boosting of response on serial testing ascribed to immune-compromised, as well as cross-reactivity with the BCG and nontuberculous mycobacteria (NTM), affect its field application with decreased sensitivity and specificity in the elderly [6, 13, 1928, 30, 31]. IGRAs are new alternatives to TST with at least equivalent sensitivity and higher specificity [6, 31].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations