2017
DOI: 10.1093/qjmed/hcw214
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tuberculosis mimicking metastases by malignancy in FDG PET/CT

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Also, the radiological appearances of tuberculosis and malignancy are very similar, thus increasing the confusion for diagnosis (Xiang et al 2021). Pott's spine is a known common differential for lytic skeletal metastases (Liu et al 2017;Ye et al 2016;Go et al 2012), and nonspecific uptake of F-18 FDG in active infection and inflammation reduces its specificity. The typical radiological features of Pott's spine include anterior destruction of vertebral body, end plate erosions, loss of disc height, paravertebral masses and contiguous multivertebral involvement (Rivas-Garcia et al 2013).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, the radiological appearances of tuberculosis and malignancy are very similar, thus increasing the confusion for diagnosis (Xiang et al 2021). Pott's spine is a known common differential for lytic skeletal metastases (Liu et al 2017;Ye et al 2016;Go et al 2012), and nonspecific uptake of F-18 FDG in active infection and inflammation reduces its specificity. The typical radiological features of Pott's spine include anterior destruction of vertebral body, end plate erosions, loss of disc height, paravertebral masses and contiguous multivertebral involvement (Rivas-Garcia et al 2013).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…PET scan lacks the specificity and inability to differentiate granulomatous from malignant involvement based on standardized uptake values. The median uptake value for lymph node is 6.5 (range 3.4–9.2) for tuberculosis and 8.0 (range 2.5–20.1) for malignancy 17,18 . Therefore, pathologic confirmation is vital for accurate staging.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…15 The recommendations related to EBUS following CT and PET scan have been enumerated in for malignancy. 17,18 Therefore, pathologic confirmation is vital for accurate staging.…”
Section: Staging and Diagnosis Of Cancermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Radiological as well as nuclear imaging modalities have fallacies when differentiating between granulomatous, reactive and malignant nodes 15 . The role of PET-CECT is established but it has lower sensitivity in non-enlarged nodal disease compared to grossly enlarged nodes 16 .…”
Section: Assessment Of Para-aortic Lymph Node (Paln)mentioning
confidence: 99%