Tuberculosis detection and the challenges of integrated care in rural China: A cross-sectional standardized patient study

Abstract

BackgroundDespite recent reductions in prevalence, China still faces a substantial tuberculosis (TB) burden, with future progress dependent on the ability of rural providers to appropriately detect and refer TB patients for further care. This study (a) provides a baseline assessment of the ability of rural providers to correctly manage presumptive TB cases; (b) measures the gap between provider knowledge and practice and; (c) evaluates how ongoing reforms of China’s health system—characterized by a movement toward “integrated care” and promotion of initial contact with grassroots providers—will affect the care of TB patients.Methods/FindingsUnannounced standardized patients (SPs) presenting with classic pulmonary TB symptoms were deployed in 3 provinces of China in July 2015. The SPs successfully completed 274 interactions across all 3 tiers of China’s rural health system, interacting with providers in 46 village clinics, 207 township health centers, and 21 county hospitals. Interactions between providers and standardized patients were assessed against international and national standards of TB care. Using a lenient definition of correct management as at least a referral, chest X-ray or sputum test, 41% (111 of 274) SPs were correctly managed. Although there were no cases of empirical anti-TB treatment, antibiotics unrelated to the treatment of TB were prescribed in 168 of 274 interactions or 61.3% (95% CI: 55%–67%). Correct management proportions significantly higher at county hospitals compared to township health centers (OR 0.06, 95% CI: 0.01–0.25, p < 0.001) and village clinics (OR 0.02, 95% CI: 0.0–0.17, p < 0.001). Correct management in tests of knowledge administered to the same 274 physicians for the same case was 45 percentage points (95% CI: 37%–53%) higher with 24 percentage points (95% CI: −33% to −15%) fewer antibiotic prescriptions. Relative to the current system, where patients can choose to bypass any level of care, simulations suggest that a system of managed referral with gatekeeping at the level of village clinics would reduce proportions of correct management from 41% to 16%, while gatekeeping at the level of the township hospital would retain correct management close to current levels at 37%. The main limitations of the study are 2-fold. First, we evaluate the management of a one-time new patient presenting with presumptive TB, which may not reflect how providers manage repeat patients or more complicated TB presentations. Second, simulations under alternate policies require behavioral and statistical assumptions that should be addressed in future applications of this method.ConclusionsThere were significant quality deficits among village clinics and township health centers in the management of a classic case of presumptive TB, with higher proportions of correct case management in county hospitals. Poor clinical performance does not arise only from a lack of knowledge, a phenomenon known as the “know-do” gap. Given significant deficits in quality of care, reforms encouraging first contact wit...

The Competence of Village Doctors in the Diagnosis and Treatment of Heart Disease in Rural China: A Nationally Representative Assessment

“…Studies have consistently shown large `know-do' gaps, or provider underperformance relative to their competence of appropriate care. 8,20,22,23 Although know-do gaps may be due to other factors such as lack of access to equipment or medication, prior studies consistently indicate that weak or misaligned incentives facing providers is a primary cause as significant gaps exist even in well-stocked settings. 24 China's difficulty in recruiting primary providers for rural areas may contribute to low provider performance.…”

“…[5][6][7] There is limited evidence, however, on the quality of primary care or its determinants in China's rural areas. While a few studies have examined care quality in certain regions of rural China, [8][9][10] no nationally representative studies have done so. To inform their efforts, policy-makers need a more comprehensive understanding of primary care quality and the barriers to its improvement.…”

Building a tuberculosis-free world: The Lancet Commission on tuberculosis

“…Moreover, referral links to the National Tuberculosis Programme are weak, with data from standardised patient studies in these three countries showing that only 28% to 45% of patients were correctly managed by primary care providers. 34,35,46 Simply put, the global capacity to diagnose, link to care, treat, and cure patients with tuberculosis is woefully inadequate for the massive burden of disease that exists. The public health implications, as well as the poor clinical and financial implications for patients, 41 are self-evident.…”

“…Unfortunately, cascade of care analyses shows large gaps in the quality of care for both adults and children, and for both drug-susceptible and drug-resistant tuberculosis in many high-burden countries. [36][37][38]112,133 Standardised patient studies in India, Kenya, South Africa, and China [33][34][35]46 have shown that the quality of care for tuberculosis is poor. In a study in China, for example, health-care providers did not correctly manage patients presenting with archetypal symptoms or results suggesting active tuberculosis 59% of the time.…”

Crucial role of primary healthcare professionals in the assessment and diagnosis of dementia

“…They have shown that the quality of primary care in low-and-middle-income countries was poor. [11][12][13][14][15][16] Most cases were incorrectly diagnosed based on a very lenient definition, and simple medical conditions were improperly managed in the majority of cases. Antibiotics were usually inappropriately overprescribed, and it was less likely for primary care providers to refer patients to higher-level hospitals for specialist care when needed.…”