2015
DOI: 10.1007/s00268-015-3158-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tube Thoracostomy: A Structured Review of Case Reports and a Standardized Format for Reporting Complications

Abstract: Our classification method provides further clarity and systematic standardization for reporting TT complications.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
44
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 210 publications
2
44
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Using our previously developed standardized methodology (Appendix) 10 , we were able to uniformly identify and report this data and correlate with angle of insertion as measured on radiographs. To our knowledge, this is the first association found betweenTT angle of insertion,elevated BMI >30 and complications.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Using our previously developed standardized methodology (Appendix) 10 , we were able to uniformly identify and report this data and correlate with angle of insertion as measured on radiographs. To our knowledge, this is the first association found betweenTT angle of insertion,elevated BMI >30 and complications.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Post-procedural chestanteroposterior (AP) or posteroanterior (PA) radiographs were reviewed (by author MH)to determine the angle of TT from skin structuresto thoracic wall and measured relative to the thoracic wall (Figure 2). A previously validated complication classification method (Appendix 1) 10 was utilized to categorize complications. Primary endpoints were TT complications, which were grouped into major categories including: insertional, positional, removal, infective/immunologicor equipment failure (Appendix 1).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Laterality for standard of care vs visual placement was assigned randomly and the procedure was repeated a total of five times on each side. For both the experimental and standard of care group a thoracoscope without insufflation was used to assess (1) intrathoracic TT placement, (2) location of TT position, (3) development complications based on a defined list of complication types (15). The TT operator was blinded to the thoracoscopic view during placement and was only allowed to utilize the TTVT for visually placed TT or open technique for standard of care.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%