1990
DOI: 10.3354/meps064123
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tube-dwelling nematodes: tube construction and possible ecological effects on sediment-water interfaces

Abstract: Free-liv~ng marine nematodes of the genus Ptycl~olaimellus build membranous tubes from detritus bound by released mucus. The mucus is produced by a ventral gland cell opening close to the lips and probably also from hypodermal gland cells along the body wall. The tubes are about 50 ,um in diameter, sinuous, and situated vertically down to l cm depth; they open at the sediment-water interface. These findings suggest that the nematodes may play a significant role at the interfaces by increasing pore water exchan… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

1
26
0

Year Published

1992
1992
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
1
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Also, meiofauna may have been responsible for this tracer migration. These small (<1 mm) organisms build microstructures that destabilize surficial sediments (Nehring et al 1990, Giere 1993, Tita et al 2000, Michaud et al 2003, allowing surficial particles to penetrate deeper into the sediments (Gerino et al 1998). However, particle displacement by meiofauna would have caused an increased penetration of the tracers with time, which was not the case in the controls between Days 5 and 30.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, meiofauna may have been responsible for this tracer migration. These small (<1 mm) organisms build microstructures that destabilize surficial sediments (Nehring et al 1990, Giere 1993, Tita et al 2000, Michaud et al 2003, allowing surficial particles to penetrate deeper into the sediments (Gerino et al 1998). However, particle displacement by meiofauna would have caused an increased penetration of the tracers with time, which was not the case in the controls between Days 5 and 30.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This same region of sediments is inhabited by abundant interstitial meiofauna, typically ranging from -10 to 500 cme3. Permanent meiofauna, such as nematodes, and temporary meiofauna, such as juvenile polychaetes, build tubes, form networks of small channels, and agitate particles during feeding and burrowing (Severin et al 1982;Chandler and Fleeger 1984;Nehring et al 1990). These activities can cause the dcstruction of features such as macrofaunal tracks and trails during particle dispersion but can also create microtopography at the sediment-water interface (Cullen 1973 though there has been occasional speculation regarding the possible influence of meiofaunal activities on solute transport near sediment-water interfaces, to our knowledge there has been no corresponding qualitative or quantitative documentation published.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Certain species from intertidal mudflats build tubes consisting of sediment and small organic particles glued together by mucus secretions from, e.g., the ventral gland, affecting sediment stability and, at the same time, probably offering shelter against both hydrodynamic impacts and predation (Nehring et al 1990, Nehring 1993. Mucus production from ventral and caudal glands is widespread.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to benefiting from any exo-enzymatic activity in the mucus (Riemann & Helmke 2002), bacteria may simply use the mucus for attachment or feed on it. The composition -and potential nutritive value for bacteria -of the nematode mucus is poorly known, but it does apparently contain a substantial share of acid mucopolysaccharides (Nehring et al 1990). In addition, C/N ratios of nematodes tend to be Table 1.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%