2021
DOI: 10.1111/jog.14817
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tubal stump pregnancy after salpingectomy—Does the time interval from surgical intervention to conception matter?

Abstract: Aim Ectopic pregnancy implantation on the tubal stump after salpingectomy is a rare location for extrauterine pregnancy, whose pathogenesis is still unknown. The purpose of this study was to examine whether the time interval elapsed from salpingectomy may predispose the embryo to implantation on the tubal stump in the next pregnancy subsequent to tube removal. Methods Nine women operated for stump pregnancy (study group) between 2008 and 2019 were retrospectively identified. For each case in the study group, 1… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 18 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, the interval between pregnancies has been reported to be as short as 2 months to as long as 204 months, with a median of 24 months [ 4 ]. A case series of 9 interstitial pregnancies after salpingectomy showed the mean interval from prior salpingectomy to subsequent pregnancy was 4.3 months [ 5 ]. However, these ectopic pregnancies can still occur and be managed with minimally invasive laparoscopic techniques as demonstrated in this case report.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, the interval between pregnancies has been reported to be as short as 2 months to as long as 204 months, with a median of 24 months [ 4 ]. A case series of 9 interstitial pregnancies after salpingectomy showed the mean interval from prior salpingectomy to subsequent pregnancy was 4.3 months [ 5 ]. However, these ectopic pregnancies can still occur and be managed with minimally invasive laparoscopic techniques as demonstrated in this case report.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%