2022
DOI: 10.3390/axioms11070314
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

TT-M Finite Element Algorithm for the Coupled Schrödinger–Boussinesq Equations

Abstract: In this article, the coupled Schrödinger–Boussinesq equations are solved numerically using the finite element method combined with the time two-mesh (TT-M) fast algorithm. The spatial direction is discretized by the standard Galerkin finite element method, the temporal direction is approximated by the TT-M Crank–Nicolson scheme, and then the numerical scheme of TT-M finite element (FE) system is formulated. The method includes three main steps: for the first step, the nonlinear system is solved on the coarse t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Several methods for finding the exact solutions to the CSBS have been presented [7][8][9][10]. Because the exact solutions to the CSBS often contain certain special functions, scholars have begun utilizing efficient methods to seek numerical solutions for it, such as the multi-symplectic method [11], orthogonal spline collocation method [12], radial basis function-finite difference method [13], cut-off function method [14], scalar auxiliary variable method [15], Adams prediction-correction method [16], finite-element method [17,18], and energy-preserving compact finite difference methods [19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several methods for finding the exact solutions to the CSBS have been presented [7][8][9][10]. Because the exact solutions to the CSBS often contain certain special functions, scholars have begun utilizing efficient methods to seek numerical solutions for it, such as the multi-symplectic method [11], orthogonal spline collocation method [12], radial basis function-finite difference method [13], cut-off function method [14], scalar auxiliary variable method [15], Adams prediction-correction method [16], finite-element method [17,18], and energy-preserving compact finite difference methods [19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A nonlinear distributed order diffusion model was efficiently solved using the TT-M algorithm in conjunction with the H 1 -Galerkin mixed finite element method by Wen et al [28], both smooth and non-smooth solutions were considered. Additionally, Tian et al [29] developed a finite element method equipped with the TT-M technique to solve the coupled Schrödinger-Boussinesq equations. Moreover, some studies have investigated combining the TT-M and finite difference methods to solve nonlinear fractional partial differential equations, such as the works of Qiu and Xu et al [30,31], who proposed and analyzed a TT-M algorithm based on finite difference methods.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%