2011
DOI: 10.1029/2010jb007873
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tsunami signals from the 2006 and 2007 Kuril earthquakes detected at a seafloor geomagnetic observatory

Abstract: A seafloor geomagnetic observatory in the northwest Pacific detected clear electromagnetic (EM) variations associated with tsunami passage from two earthquakes that occurred along the Kuril Trench. Previous seismological analyses indicated that the M8.3 earthquake on 15 November 2006 was an underthrust type on the landward slope of the trench, while the M8.1 earthquake on 13 January 2007 was a normal fault type on the seaward side. The EM measurements enabled precise monitoring of the tsunami propagation direc… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

4
53
0
6

Year Published

2012
2012
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(63 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
4
53
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Because the outer-rise event occurred at shallow depth with a high angle fault, the tsunami contains much higher frequency component than those tsunamis caused by typical underthrust earthquakes. Toh et al (2011) shows that the far-field observed tsunami generated by the 2007 Kurile outerrise earthquake had a dispersive character, but the that generated by the 2006 Kurile underthrust earthquake did not.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because the outer-rise event occurred at shallow depth with a high angle fault, the tsunami contains much higher frequency component than those tsunamis caused by typical underthrust earthquakes. Toh et al (2011) shows that the far-field observed tsunami generated by the 2007 Kurile outerrise earthquake had a dispersive character, but the that generated by the 2006 Kurile underthrust earthquake did not.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is theoretically well understood that the movement of electricallyconductive ocean water in an ambient geomagnetic field induces secondary EM fields in the oceans (Sanford, 1971). However, until recent advances in high-precision measurement of the EM fields enabled the seafloor and island measurement of the tsunami signals (Manoj et al, 2011;Toh et al, 2011), this type of research was restricted by the lowsignal tsunami EM levels. The EM measurement enables the evaluation of tsunami propagation direction and particle motion of the seawater, which could not be obtained from the pressure measurement.…”
Section: Seismic and Tsunami Records Of The 2010 Chilean Earthquakementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The tsunami detector prototype installed on SN1, called Tsunameter, has been previously tested in the Gulf of Cadiz for about two years in the framework of the European Commission (EC) project "NEAR shore sourcES of Tsunamis: toward an early warning system" (NEAREST, http://nearest.bo.ismar.cnr.it). Moreover, the observatory has been equipped to study acoustic and magnetic tsunami precursors [9], [10]. After a long series of tests in laboratory to check all the functionalities, the NEMO-SN1 observatory (i.e., SN1 abyssal station at TSN and O DE abyssal acoustic station at TSS) was successfully deployed on June 9, 2012, using the cable ship Certamen owned by Elettra Tlc (Catania, Italy).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%