2018
DOI: 10.1061/(asce)st.1943-541x.0002068
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tsunami-Resilient Building Design Considerations for Coastal Communities of Washington, Oregon, and California

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since ASCE 7-16 guideline is linked with IBC (Chock et al , 2018), ASCE 7–16 guidelines is considered as the leading benchmark of this study to form the major headings of local guideline, which is to be developed by amalgamating all the existing guidelines. Scope of the ASCE Tsunami Design Provisions as per Chapter 6 in the 2016 edition of the ASCE 7 guideline includes “Tsunami loads and effects” with 15 major aspects as Table 1.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since ASCE 7-16 guideline is linked with IBC (Chock et al , 2018), ASCE 7–16 guidelines is considered as the leading benchmark of this study to form the major headings of local guideline, which is to be developed by amalgamating all the existing guidelines. Scope of the ASCE Tsunami Design Provisions as per Chapter 6 in the 2016 edition of the ASCE 7 guideline includes “Tsunami loads and effects” with 15 major aspects as Table 1.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, local jurisdictions are strongly encouraged to require tsunami design for taller TRC II buildings in order to provide secondary refuge-of-last-resort and improve community resilience. Chock et al (2018) established suitable height thresholds for communities throughout the US Pacific coast, satisfying both the prescriptive acceptance criteria and a recommended height at least 3.66 m greater than the inundation depth. For the case-study building, the upper three stories would be above ℎ max , hence they could function as a refuge according to the proposal of Chock et al (2018).…”
Section: Prototype Buildingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Chock et al (2018) established suitable height thresholds for communities throughout the US Pacific coast, satisfying both the prescriptive acceptance criteria and a recommended height at least 3.66 m greater than the inundation depth. For the case-study building, the upper three stories would be above ℎ max , hence they could function as a refuge according to the proposal of Chock et al (2018).…”
Section: Prototype Buildingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The 2016 edition of ASCE 7 (ASCE 2016), Chapter 6 on tsunami loads and effects, became the first national, consensusbased standard for tsunami resilience for application in Alaska, Washington, Oregon, California, and Hawaii and has been adopted by the 2018 International Building Code (ICC 2012). Chock et al (2018) detail the process of development and discuss applications to the design of tsunami-resilient buildings within a community including the use of buildings for vertical evacuation.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%