2020
DOI: 10.1061/(asce)ww.1943-5460.0000560
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tsunami Loads on a Representative Coastal Bridge Deck: Experimental Study and Validation of Design Equations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

1
28
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
1
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This highlighted the need to be able to identify a priori the tsunami wave type that is expected to impact a specific coastal area in order to design properly a new structure or strengthen an existing one at that location. Fortunately, several simplified predictive load equations have been developed in the literature for a range of different types of structures, for both bores [19,20] and unbroken solitary waves [21,22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This highlighted the need to be able to identify a priori the tsunami wave type that is expected to impact a specific coastal area in order to design properly a new structure or strengthen an existing one at that location. Fortunately, several simplified predictive load equations have been developed in the literature for a range of different types of structures, for both bores [19,20] and unbroken solitary waves [21,22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the development of several predictive wave load equations in recent years (e.g. [6][7][8][9][10]) the majority of them were calibrated with datasets from specific deck types, making it hard to find a set of universal equations that can be applied to other deck configurations and geometries outside the original dataset. Therefore, it became necessary to understand the effects of extreme waves on a wider range of coastal decks, and to develop accurate methodologies for the prediction of the applied loads.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A significant number of laboratory tests have been carried out to study the wavedeck interaction since the turning point (e.g., Douglass et al 2006;IEMURA et al 2007;Sugimoto and Unjoh 2007;Bradner 2008;McPherson 2008;Cuomo et al 2009;Sheppard and Marin 2009;Bradner et al 2011;Lau et al 2011;Lukkunaprasit et al 2011;Hayatdavoodi et al 2014;Rahman et al 2014;Seiffert et al 2014;Seiffert et al 2015;Guo et al 2015a;Chen et al 2016;Chen et al 2018;Xiao and Guo 2018;Huang, Zhu, Cui, Duan, and Cai, 2018;Zhu et al 2018;Huang, Duan, et al, 2019;Fang et al 2019;Xiang et al 2020;Zhu and Dong 2020). To gain a better understanding of the wave-deck interaction, Douglass et al (2006) conducted experimental tests with a scale model (1:15) hit by normally incident waves under various water conditions, and some additional understandings of the magnitude of the forces that occurred for a set of wave conditions and given bridge geometry were provided.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To gain a better understanding of the wave-deck interaction, Douglass et al (2006) conducted experimental tests with a scale model (1:15) hit by normally incident waves under various water conditions, and some additional understandings of the magnitude of the forces that occurred for a set of wave conditions and given bridge geometry were provided. Fang et al (2019) conducted a detailed test covering different wave angles in the wave flume, and the characteristics of wave forces under different wave conditions were studied, inferring the vertical wave force reached the peak at a wave angle of 30°under a clearance of 0.04 m. A lot of empirical formulas were later proposed for fast evaluation of wave forces on bridge decks based on the experimental results (e.g., Douglass et al 2006;Cuomo et al 2007;AASHTO, 2008;Chen et al 2009;Chen et al 2018;Liu et al 2019;Xiang et al 2020). Nevertheless, the majority of the empirical formula provides the maximum wave forces acting on the coastal bridge decks other than the instantaneous wave-deck interaction in each moment, which may bring errors in the final design of bridge decks.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation