2017
DOI: 10.9753/icce.v35.structures.30
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tsunami Induced Forces in Bridges: Large-Scale Experiments and the Role of Air-Entrapment

Abstract: In this study large scale hydraulic experiments of tsunami waves impacting a straight composite I-girder bridge were conducted in the LWF at Oregon State University. Both solitary waves and turbulent bores were tested and the experimental results revealed the existence of 4 different phases in the vertical force histories, among which is (i) a phase with a large applied moment and bridge rotation at the time of the first impact of the tsunami bore on the bridge, and (ii) a phase with a governing uplift mode of… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While the majority of the numerical studies focused on two-dimensional (2D) models, some of them pointed out that the interaction between a deck and the wave is not a completely two-dimensional process, especially when (i) the deck has diaphragms that trap the air [43][44][45], (ii) the elevated slab has air-vents [19], (iii) the deck is skewed [46][47][48], (iv) the wave is oblique [46] or (v) water-borne debris is trapped in front of the deck at an off-center location [49]. For example, Bozognia and Lee [43] showed that simplified 2D simulations of periodic waves impacting a concrete deck with diaphragms, could not represent the motion of air in the longitudinal direction.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the majority of the numerical studies focused on two-dimensional (2D) models, some of them pointed out that the interaction between a deck and the wave is not a completely two-dimensional process, especially when (i) the deck has diaphragms that trap the air [43][44][45], (ii) the elevated slab has air-vents [19], (iii) the deck is skewed [46][47][48], (iv) the wave is oblique [46] or (v) water-borne debris is trapped in front of the deck at an off-center location [49]. For example, Bozognia and Lee [43] showed that simplified 2D simulations of periodic waves impacting a concrete deck with diaphragms, could not represent the motion of air in the longitudinal direction.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It should be noted that the air and water are assumed as incompressible flows in the established numerical model. The trapped air has a critical role and increases the uplift forces [32][33][34][35][36], as well as the overturning moment [34] on the bridges. Moreover, refs.…”
Section: Model Setups and Boundary Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, refs. [35] and [36] indicated the generation of three-dimensional effects even in the case of a normal wave impact on a straight bridge (without any obliqueness) due to the tendency of the air to move in the 3rd direction. The effects of trapped air may be mitigated by setting air venting holes.…”
Section: Model Setups and Boundary Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the majority of the numerical studies focused on two-dimensional (2D) models, some of them pointed out that the interaction between a deck and the wave is not a completely two-dimensional process, especially when (i) the deck has diaphragms that trap the air [44][45][46], (ii) the elevated slab has air-vents [19], (iii) the deck is skewed [47][48][49] (iv) the wave is oblique [49], or (v) water-borne debris is trapped in front of the deck at an off-center location [50]. For example, Bozognia and Lee [44] showed that simplified 2D simulations of periodic waves impacting a concrete deck with diaphragms, could not represent the motion of air in the longitudinal direction.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%