2022
DOI: 10.1017/s0269964822000444
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tsallis value-at-risk: generalized entropic value-at-risk

Abstract: Motivated by Ahmadi-Javid (Journal of Optimization Theory Applications, 155(3), 2012, 1105–1123) and Ahmadi-Javid and Pichler (Mathematics and Financial Economics, 11, 2017, 527–550), the concept of Tsallis Value-at-Risk (TsVaR) based on Tsallis entropy is introduced in this paper. TsVaR corresponds to the tightest possible upper bound obtained from the Chernoff inequality for the Value-at-Risk. The main properties and analogous dual representation of TsVaR are investigated. These results partially generalize … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A duality result between the TsVaRs and corresponding nonlinear expectations are provided, which serves as a pathway to obtain the worst-case distorted reversion measures. For the upper-TsVaR with 0 < q < 1 − 𝛼 −1 , the following relationship holds true by the direct application of Lemmas 3.6 and 3.7, and Theorem 3.8 of Zou et al (2022) to our setting:…”
Section: Dualitymentioning
confidence: 87%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…A duality result between the TsVaRs and corresponding nonlinear expectations are provided, which serves as a pathway to obtain the worst-case distorted reversion measures. For the upper-TsVaR with 0 < q < 1 − 𝛼 −1 , the following relationship holds true by the direct application of Lemmas 3.6 and 3.7, and Theorem 3.8 of Zou et al (2022) to our setting:…”
Section: Dualitymentioning
confidence: 87%
“…TsVaR has been considered for the worst-case overestimation of a random variable of interest because the main motivation for its development was the evaluation of tail risks (Zou et al, 2022). However, we are considering not only the upper bound of a statistic but also the lower bound.…”
Section: Objective and Contributionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations