2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.actatropica.2016.08.029
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Trypanosoma cruzi seroprevalence in pregnant women and screening by PCR and microhaematocrit in newborns from Guanajuato, Mexico

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

2
9
1
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
2
9
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…38 Another recent study found 20.0% positive PCR on cord blood among T. cruzi seropositive mothers in Guanajuato, Mexico. 7 In Argentina, PCR positive rates as high as 30.8% in Jujuy and 27.2% in Formosa have been recently reported. 39 PCR on cord blood is not universally accepted for diagnosing congenital Chagas disease at birth.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…38 Another recent study found 20.0% positive PCR on cord blood among T. cruzi seropositive mothers in Guanajuato, Mexico. 7 In Argentina, PCR positive rates as high as 30.8% in Jujuy and 27.2% in Formosa have been recently reported. 39 PCR on cord blood is not universally accepted for diagnosing congenital Chagas disease at birth.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5 Other Mexican studies relied mostly on polymerase chain reaction (PCR) on cord blood to diagnose congenital transmission of T. cruzi. [6][7][8] A recent study identified one case of congenital Chagas disease among 32 infected mothers in El Salvador. 9 It has been suggested that the congenital transmission rate might vary according to the parasite's genotype, but available data are inconclusive.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The higher sensitivity of the micromethod in sick infants compared to asymptomatic ones is the direct result of these higher parasite burdens. Most recent studies have not included clinical data [21,22], or have described all infected infants as asymptomatic [8,23]; however, the lack of findings may reflect the small numbers of infected infants in most studies (usually <10). A recent large study included 125 infected infants, but did not report clinical status data [24].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During the first weeks of life, diagnosis relies on the microscopic observation of bloodstream parasites, usually with concentration techniques, like the microhematocrit method or micromethod (14). The micromethod has been used for many years in areas of endemicity for the early detection of parasites in newborn blood, although its lack of sensitivity can miss up to 50% of infected infants (34). The sensitivity of the technique varies according to the parasitemia (35).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%