2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbamem.2018.09.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Trypanosoma brucei aquaglyceroporins mediate the transport of metabolic end-products: Methylglyoxal, D-lactate, L-lactate and acetate

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Tumor cells opt for relatively inefficient anaerobic glycolysis to generate abundant lactate even under oxygen-rich conditions. In T. brucei , BSFs rely heavily on glycolysis for ATP biosynthesis even under aerobic conditions, rather than tricarboxylic acid cycle and oxidative phosphorylation, whereas PCFs rely primarily on oxidative phosphorylation ( Bakker et al, 1997 ; Uzcátegui et al, 2018 ). During glycolysis, glucose consumed by cells is broken down to generate energy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Tumor cells opt for relatively inefficient anaerobic glycolysis to generate abundant lactate even under oxygen-rich conditions. In T. brucei , BSFs rely heavily on glycolysis for ATP biosynthesis even under aerobic conditions, rather than tricarboxylic acid cycle and oxidative phosphorylation, whereas PCFs rely primarily on oxidative phosphorylation ( Bakker et al, 1997 ; Uzcátegui et al, 2018 ). During glycolysis, glucose consumed by cells is broken down to generate energy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast to other eukaryotes, trypanosomes compartmentalize their glycolytic enzymes in peroxisome-derived organelles known as glycosomes ( Bauer and Morris, 2017 ). Glycolysis generates several metabolic end-products that must be eliminated ( Uzcátegui et al, 2018 ). Lactate is abundantly produced during glycolysis in conventional eukaryotes ( Izzo and Wellen, 2019 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tb AQP2 also presents a very different expression pattern compared to Tb AQP1 (the most abundant MIP in T. brucei ) and Tb AQP3 (only present in blood stages) 46 . Also, Tb AQP2 and Tb AQP3 have different subcellular localization and might play different roles in permeating water, glycerol and still undiscovered solutes 46 , 48 , 49 . Tb AQP2 changes in key residues plus the different localization and transcription levels among paralogs point to their neofunctionalization in the last common ancestor of T. brucei and T. evansi .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the CCCP inhibition of TbAQP2 must be seen as an unexpected and serious side effect that occurs at conventionally used concentrations. The different susceptibility of TbAQP2 and TbAQP3 for CCCP interaction is remarkable given their generally similar protein layout and electrostatic surface charge distribution [ 9 ]. Therefore, we relate the CCCP selectivity to the different selectivity filter layouts of TbAQP2 and TbAQP3 suggesting binding of CCCP in the peculiar ar/R region of TbAQP2 ( Figure 6 a).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…TbAQP2 is a member of the solute channel subfamily of the ubiquitous homotetrameric aquaporins (AQP). It facilitates, besides water, the transmembrane passage of glycerol, urea, dihydroxyacetone [ 6 ], ammonia [ 7 ], arsenite and antimonite [ 8 ], lactic acid and methylglyoxal [ 9 ]. Although this substrate spectrum is common for aquaglyceroporins, the amino acid composition of the TbAQP2 selectivity filter is special [ 5 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%