2019
DOI: 10.1007/s11225-019-09862-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Truthmakers and Normative Conflicts

Abstract: By building on work by Kit Fine, we develop a sound and complete truthmaker semantics for Lou Goble's conflict tolerant deontic logic BDL.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
(31 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It turns out that in many such cases, exact truthmakers provide a fruitful framework for developing hyperintensional logics for the relevant concepts (cf. [1, 2, 8, 15, 16]). In this setting, the logic of exact entailment becomes the appropriate logic for reasoning within hyperintensional contexts.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It turns out that in many such cases, exact truthmakers provide a fruitful framework for developing hyperintensional logics for the relevant concepts (cf. [1, 2, 8, 15, 16]). In this setting, the logic of exact entailment becomes the appropriate logic for reasoning within hyperintensional contexts.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 10 For a more sophisticated take on normative expectation, one should consult state-theoretic accounts of permission and obligation. See Anglberger, Korbmacher, and Faroldi (2016) and Anglberger and Korbmacher (2020). …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the claims of this paper do not fundamentally depend on state representations as opposed to world representations.10 For a more sophisticated take on normative expectation, one should consult state-theoretic accounts of permission and obligation. SeeAnglberger, Korbmacher, and Faroldi (2016) andAnglberger and Korbmacher (2020).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%