2013
DOI: 10.12697/spe.2013.6.2.05
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Truth-telling and the Asymmetry of the Attitude to Truth-telling to Dying Patients in Latvia

Abstract: This article deals with concerns related to truth-telling in interaction between the doctor and the dying patient, exploring such issues as conflicting duties of veracity and non-maleficence, truthfulness and deception, and reasons behind physicians' decisions either to withhold or to disclose information about patients' diagnoses and prognoses. It focuses on various attitudes to truth-telling to dying patients, such as symmetry and asymmetry, both of which can be positive and negative. The empirical part of t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 5 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Research evaluation practice should take into consideration differences between scientific disciplines; otherwise, it risks epistemic injustice between disciplines. Current scientometric practices are better suited for laboratory sciences than for the humanities because they serve more disciplines aimed to create facts than disciplines aimed to enhance understanding (Lohkivi et al, 2012). Evaluation practices should be improved to better conform to epistemic aims of disciplines, which creates understanding between cultures by sharing knowledge contained in sources written in those cultures' languages.…”
Section: Benefits Of the Ldimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Research evaluation practice should take into consideration differences between scientific disciplines; otherwise, it risks epistemic injustice between disciplines. Current scientometric practices are better suited for laboratory sciences than for the humanities because they serve more disciplines aimed to create facts than disciplines aimed to enhance understanding (Lohkivi et al, 2012). Evaluation practices should be improved to better conform to epistemic aims of disciplines, which creates understanding between cultures by sharing knowledge contained in sources written in those cultures' languages.…”
Section: Benefits Of the Ldimentioning
confidence: 99%