Proceedings of the 26th International Conference on World Wide Web Companion - WWW '17 Companion 2017
DOI: 10.1145/3041021.3053374
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Truth Discovery from Conflicting Multi-Valued Objects

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The problem of conflict resolution is still critical in different fields (social, education, etc.) [5,9].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The problem of conflict resolution is still critical in different fields (social, education, etc.) [5,9].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most existing truth discovery methods assume that each object has only one property. This assumption is relaxed in [5,6,16,22] and these methods are develop to solve multi-truth truth discovery problem. In [3,4,17], the authors assume that the sources are not independent.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Example 1 shows and explains an application case of truth finding in the context of set expansion: in Section 3.3, we formally define the procedure. For more details about the state-of-the-art truth finding approaches and their comparative evaluation, we refer our readers to Dong and Naumann (2009), Li et al (2012), Attia Waguih and Berti-Équille (2014), Waguih et al (2015), Berti-Equille and Borge-Holthoefer (2015), Fang (2017).…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Advanced approaches, using biased value confidence scores with the trustworthy levels of the input sources, have been then proposed. Those advanced approaches implement an iterative process and could be classified as follows: Agreement-based methods, including TruthFinder (Yin et al , 2008), Cosine, 2-Estimates and 3-Estimates (Galland et al , 2010), use the notion of majority to iteratively computes source trustworthiness and value confidence score until convergence. MAP estimation-based methods, including MLE (Wang et al , 2012), LTM (Zhao et al , 2012) and LCA models (Pasternack and Roth, 2013), are built on Maximum A Posteriori paradigm. Bayesian inference-based methods, including four variants of Depen models (Dong et al , 2009a) and SmartMTD (Fang, 2017; Fang et al , 2017), are based on a Bayesian analysis. …”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation