2021
DOI: 10.1109/tkde.2019.2936189
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Truth Discovery by Claim and Source Embedding

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Based on these two fundamental assumptions, researchers have proposed numerous truth discovery algorithms. Methods for truth discovery are categorized into two types: single-truth discovery methods [5][6] and multi-truth discovery methods [7][8]. Some methods merge the two [9].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on these two fundamental assumptions, researchers have proposed numerous truth discovery algorithms. Methods for truth discovery are categorized into two types: single-truth discovery methods [5][6] and multi-truth discovery methods [7][8]. Some methods merge the two [9].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where E q(β k ) [log(β k )] and E q(πn) [log(π n,k )] are computed using (30) and (45) in the sequel, respectively. On the other hand, if A(n, m) = 0, we have (31) in the sequel.…”
Section: Community Membership Indicators Zmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To mitigate this problem, the Community BCC (CBCC) model was proposed by [29], which grouped agents with similar backgrounds into communities and assumed that the confusion matrix of an agent is a perturbation of the confusion matrix of its community. In [30], the co-occurrence of two agents across different events is considered but communities of agents are not considered in this paper. In [31], the agent correlation is considered by estimating agent reliabilities at sub-type levels instead of event classes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%