Truth Disclosure at the End of Life: A Qualitative Study of Internal Medicine Residents in the United Arab Emirates

Abstract

Background Respect for patient autonomy has become the guiding biomedical ethical tenet in the West; yet, moral values are contextual and culturally relevant. In the collectivist society of the Middle East, families and physicians have historically believed that concealing truth about a terminal illness is more ethical and compassionate. Recent studies reveal a trend toward truth disclosure. Objective To gain insight into resident experiences with, and barriers to, truth disclosure in terminally ill patients in the United Arab Emirates (UAE). Methods Focus group interviews were conducted with first through fourth year internal medicine residents and recent graduates at two large academic medical centers in the UAE. Qualitative thematic content analysis was used to identify themes related to communication and truth telling in end-of-life care. Results Residents revealed that non-disclosure of medical information in serious illness is a common practice in UAE hospitals. Barriers to truth telling include family objection, deficits in medical training, and inconsistently implemented institutional guidelines. Conclusion Educational and policy interventions are needed to improve physician-patient communication, decrease patient-family-physician tension, and alleviate trainee moral distress.

Intensive Care Unit Nurses' Attitudes Toward Truth-Telling, Life-Sustaining Treatment, and Decision-Making Intention for End-of-Life Patients

“…Truth-telling is a challenging task for medical staff. Whether patients know the truth about their condition and whether they can autonomously make decisions directly affect the level of dignity and quality of life at the end of life 3-5 . In China, doctors and families often hide the truth about patients' conditions 6 .…”