2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.futures.2010.02.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Truth claims and explanatory claims—An ontological typology of futures studies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
77
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(80 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
3
77
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Like Blackman (1994), he also declares that futures studies is to make more informed decisions and choices when trying to manage the processes of change, rather than as an engine for making predictions. As Bergman et al (2010) postulate, it is not that truth which is sought but, rather, an explanation that is relevant through those 'what ifs' asked as to how an event or phenomena could or might occur. Therefore, thinking the impossible as possibilities.…”
Section: Futuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Like Blackman (1994), he also declares that futures studies is to make more informed decisions and choices when trying to manage the processes of change, rather than as an engine for making predictions. As Bergman et al (2010) postulate, it is not that truth which is sought but, rather, an explanation that is relevant through those 'what ifs' asked as to how an event or phenomena could or might occur. Therefore, thinking the impossible as possibilities.…”
Section: Futuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, liminality from a cognitive perspective links to uncertainty, being both unknown and or being science fiction (Bergman et al 2010). For some the pathway may be clear and technology better known.…”
Section: Driver 2: the Digital Revolutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They identify and bind knowledge and form a framework to help researchers understand a particular phenomenon and thus make explanatory claims (Bergman et al, 2010). Essentially, conceptual frameworks are concepts explained in diagrammatical form and indicating relationships through connections.…”
Section: Conceptual Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fourth, as mediating technologies in vision constitute a sexual economy in films like Peeping Tom (1960) and A Snake of June (2002). Bergman et al (2010) argue that science fiction is a portrayal of the future fundamentally using technology as the central feature to explain the impossible. Yeoman and Mars (2012) in the paper Robots, Men and Sex Tourism portray Amsterdam's red light district in 2050 where prostitutes are android sex workers who are clean of sexually transmitted infections.…”
Section: ) Notesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The next section explores the future, making explanatory claims about future technologies that may seem to be in the realms of science fiction but which can be contextualized by the definition and purpose of Bergman, Karlsson, and Axelsson (2010) …”
Section: The Future: How Technology Could Shape Play and Enhance Festmentioning
confidence: 99%