Trusted Player Transfer Evaluation for Sport Markets Based on Blockchain and Locality-Sensitive Hashing

Abstract

With the wide popularity of various sport items and the continuous prosperity of sport business, player transfer events are becoming more and more frequent, which gives birth to a big player transfer market with attractive attentions of spectators. However, for the purposes of business competition or concerns of privacy disclosure, the multiple parties involved in an identical player transfer event are often reluctant to release the concrete transfer fees of a player as the transfer fee is always sensitive enough for the player himself or herself as well as the involved multiple sport clubs. The hidden player transfer fees block the fair and transparent sport business trades and cheat prospective spectators to some extent, which decreases the spectator trust towards player market value and finally, lowers the spectators' satisfaction towards sport business. In this situation, it is becoming a necessity to develop a trusted player transfer evaluation method supported by all the parties involved in player transfer events. Inspired by this challenging task, a trusted player transfer evaluation method with privacy protection is put forward in this paper, which is mainly based on Locality-Sensitive Hashing (LSH) and Blockchain technologies and named TPTELSH+B. At last, a series of simulated experiments are deployed to validate the feasibility of our proposed TPTELSH+B algorithm. Experimental results report that TPTELSH+B has a good evaluation performance with competitive approaches.

Use of Blockchain Technology in the Domain of Physical Exercise, Physical Activity, Sport, and Active Ageing: A Systematic Review

“…Among these 30 papers, 13 were finally eliminated because they did not meet the inclusion criteria. Four papers were eliminated under the label "Not related to PE, PA, sport, or ageing" [32,[39][40][41], six under the label "Focused on the BC properties, not applications" [32,[42][43][44][45][46], and finally four papers were removed for other reasons (preliminary theoretical proposal, mechanisms for avoidance of fraud in the soccer transfer market, theoretical explanation) [47][48][49][50]. The works rated with an average of 2.5 or 3 points, made it directly to the next phase.…”