Trust Processes in Sport in the Context of Doping

Dreiskämper, Dennis; Pöppel, Katharina; Westmattelmann, Daniel; Schewe, Gerhard; Strauß, Bernd

doi:10.1007/978-3-319-28059-2_7

Cited by 8 publications

(8 citation statements)

References 24 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The overall trust scores (combined scores for the items on capability to fulfill the role, taking care of members and keeping promises) were between 3 and 4 on the Likert scale, and clearly showed that only comprehensive education significantly increases the level of trust of federations (IOC, WADA, NADO, International and National Federation), as perceived by athletes. If trust plays a role in literacy and compliance in anti-doping (Dreiskämper et al, 2016 ) as important as that which it plays in health science, there is a need for comprehensive anti-doping education. Similar results (and conclusions) were found for legitimacy; however, this concept needs to be discussed in more detail.…”

Section: Results Of Phase One—tool Development and Testingmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Anti-doping legitimacy was assessed by three statements covering normative (anti-doping is important because it protects clean sport, which is worth protecting) and procedural (fair process and fair outcome) legitimacy (Woolway et al, 2020 ). The perceived trust of different organizations was assessed using three statements pertaining to ability, benevolence and integrity, as important factors in perceived trust (Mayer et al, 1995 ) also applied by Dreiskämper et al ( 2016 ) in the context of anti-doping. In this study, ability was operationalized as trust in the capability of an organization to fulfill its designated role; benevolence referred to the concern of the organization for its members and integrity (keeping of promises).…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The perceived trust of different organizations was assessed using three statements pertaining to ability, benevolence and integrity, as important factors in perceived trust (Mayer et al, 1995) also applied by Dreiskämper et al (2016) in the context of antidoping. In this study, ability was operationalized as trust in the capability of an organization to fulfill its designated role; benevolence referred to the concern of the organization for its members and integrity (keeping of promises).…”

Section: Perceptions Of Anti-doping Legitimacy and Trustmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Legitimacy is what organizations are set out to do (that is what should work in principle); trustworthiness is a characteristic of this organization judged on past and present conducts, and trust (by a person) is an anticipation of what organizations will actually do in a specific context. Dreiskämper et al ( 2016 ) trustworthiness scale for anti-doping organizations is based on the three pillars of trust—ability, benevolence, and integrity—that were originally proposed by Mayer et al ( 1995 )—and showed its importance in anti-doping.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

GRADE IT—A Literacy-Based Assessment Tool for Generating Research-Based Assessment Data to Evidence the ImpacT of Anti-doping Education via Athletes' Capability to Make the Right Decision

Blank¹,

Gatterer²,

Overbye³

et al. 2022

Front. Sports Act. Living

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The International Standard for Education (ISE) mandates Code Signatories to plan, deliver, and evaluate anti-doping education. Performance-based evaluation of anti-doping education requires alignment between educational goals, content, and defined outcomes. Based on an existentialist teaching and learning philosophy, we aimed to develop and test an anti-doping impact evaluation tool, to assess the impact of anti-doping education on doping awareness, literacy (DAL), perceived trust, and legitimacy. We propose that the impact of anti-doping education is best captured through assessment of situation-specific (social) cognitive mediators of actions that influence athletes' choices in the context of sport-related goals. In phase one, we aimed to develop and test the Generating Research-based Assessment Data to Evidence the ImpacT of anti-doping education (GRADE IT) evaluation tool that comprised a set of social cognitive components: anti-doping knowledge, DAL, perceived trust, and legitimacy of anti-doping (organizations). In phase two we assessed whether anti-doping education impacts knowledge, the three DAL stages (functional, interactive, and critical literacy), perceived trust and legitimacy. Phase one enrolled 986 junior elite athletes, and we showed that all GRADE IT components performed well. After revision of the tool for phase two, we validated the assumption that anti-doping education impacts the likelihood that athletes will make the “right” choice (based on a new set of data from 1,255 junior elite athletes). Comprehensive education was associated with higher scores for all stages of DAL, as well as perceived trust and legitimacy. Even athletes reporting no education had positive scores for all included outcomes, supporting the assumption that most athletes wish to engage in clean sport behaviors and might need anti-doping education not to prevent them from doping, but rather to reinforce their commitment to clean sport. In conclusion, GRADE IT, which is available in 23 languages, is a suitable tool for application to young, emerging athletes to satisfy the ISE requirement for evaluating anti-doping education programs. Researchers and practitioners alike are advised to collect additional data to further validate the tool for adult athletes, and to apply it longitudinally to identify if changes in doping prevention policies have a delayed effect on DAL, perceived trust, and legitimacy.

show abstract

Section: Results Of Phase One—tool Development and Testingmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Perceptions Of Anti-doping Legitimacy and Trustmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

GRADE IT—A Literacy-Based Assessment Tool for Generating Research-Based Assessment Data to Evidence the ImpacT of Anti-doping Education via Athletes' Capability to Make the Right Decision

Blank¹,

Gatterer²,

Overbye³

et al. 2022

Front. Sports Act. Living

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Even without any direct interaction or experience, readers of a newspaper might be unreasonably afraid of criminals or terrorist groups on the basis of their public presence; or, for instance, they might feel an active commitment toward an athlete at the Olympics based on his public presence (cf. Dreiskämper, Pöppel, Westmattelmann, Schewe, & Strauss, 2016). If we feel related to a public social actor (in good or bad ways), it will also be easier to determine whether we can rely on his testimony or believe what he is saying.…”

Section: The Processing Of Social Presence In Unidirectional Channelsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Trust and Communication: Foundations of Interconnectivity

Kunnel¹

2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This project was funded as a doctoral dissertation by the Research Training Group 1712/1, "Trust and Communication in a Digitized World," of the German Research Foundation (DFG). It was further financially supported by the Department of Communication at the University of Münster. I would like to express my sincere gratitude to my advisor Thorsten Quandt for his support and mentorship. I would like to thank Jörg Becker, who, as a member of my thesis committee, allowed me to present my work in the field of information systems and information management, and Bernd Blöbaum, who initiated the research training group. I would like to thank Edward M. Levy for editing this book with nuance and clarity. My sincere thanks also go to my fellow doctoral researchers, who allowed me to explore the issues of trust and communication in new ways. In particular, I am grateful to

show abstract