‘Trust my doctor, trust my pancreas’: trust as an emergent quality of social practice

Abstract

BackgroundGrowing attention is being paid to the importance of trust, and its corollaries such as mistrust and distrust, in health service and the central place they have in assessments of quality of care. Although initially focussing on doctor-patient relationships, more recent literature has broadened its remit to include trust held in more abstract entities, such as organisations and institutions. There has consequently been growing interest to develop rigorous and universal measures of trust.MethodsDrawing on illustrative ethnographic material from observational research in a UK diabetes clinic, this paper supports an approach that foregrounds social practice and resists conceiving trust as solely a psychological state that can be divorced from its context. Beyond exploring the less-than-conscious nature of trust, the interpretations attend to the extent to which trust practices are distributed across a range of actors.ResultsData from clinical encounters reveal the extent to which matters of trust can emerge from the relationships between people, and sometimes people and things, as a result of a wide range of pragmatic concerns, and hence can usefully be conceived of as an extended property of a situation rather than a person. Trust is rarely explicitly articulated, but remains a subtle feature of experience that is frequently ineffable.ConclusionsA practice approach highlights some of the problems with adopting a general psychological or intellectualist conception of trust. In particular, assuming it is a sufficiently stable internal state that can be stored or measured not only transforms a diffuse and often ephemeral quality into a durable thing, but ultimately presents it as a generic state that has meaning independent of the specific relationships and context that achieve it. Emphasising the context-specific nature of trust practices does not dismiss the potential of matters of trust, when they emerge, to be transposed to other contexts. But it does highlight how, on each occasion, trust as a relational quality is ways ‘done’ or ‘achieved’ anew.

Understanding Older Adult's Perceptions of Factors that Support Trust in Human and Robot Care Providers

“…To gain a deeper knowledge about trust in this context, we took a qualitative approach to determine the underlying reasons behind why a person decides to trust a care provider for a certain task. Because very little is known about this context, as previously discussed, and there is no established standard measurement for trust [14], qualitative data collection is the most informative for our purposes.…”

A delicate balance between control and flexibility: Experiences of care and support among pre‐teenage children with type 1 diabetes and their families

“…(mother) Accordingly, it has been demonstrated that, in diabetes care, trust is related to the need to establish a feeling of stability across different kinds of relationships so as to counter feelings of vulnerability or uncertainty (Cohn, 2015). However, for pre-teens, trust had a different connotation.…”

Disrupting household food consumption through experimental HomeLabs: Outcomes, connections, contexts

“…Furthermore, the researcher acted as a sounding board, a source of knowledge and inspiration, and an important external driver for participants to persist with reconfigured practices even when this required additional learning and effort in the transitional phase. This generated important social interaction and built relations of trust (Cohn, 2015). Such benefits should not be underestimated, but therein lies a considerable challenge for those driving sustainable eating paradigms.…”