2001
DOI: 10.1111/1468-0009.00223
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Trust in Physicians and Medical Institutions: What Is It, Can It Be Measured, and Does It Matter?

Abstract: Despite the profound and pervasive importance of trust in medical settings, there is no commonly shared understanding of what trust means, and little is known about what difference trust actually makes, what factors affect trust, and how trust relates to other similar attitudes and behaviors. To address this gap in understanding, the emerging theoretical, empirical, and public policy literature on trust in physicians and in medical institutions is reviewed and synthesized. Based on this review and additional r… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

43
1,147
6
29

Year Published

2004
2004
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,129 publications
(1,255 citation statements)
references
References 73 publications
43
1,147
6
29
Order By: Relevance
“…= 0.118; p = 0.01). This finding agrees with the results from other empirical studies on trust (Hall et al, 2001). Furthermore, service users with more psychiatric symptoms (coeff.…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 92%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…= 0.118; p = 0.01). This finding agrees with the results from other empirical studies on trust (Hall et al, 2001). Furthermore, service users with more psychiatric symptoms (coeff.…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Furthermore, the instrument was shortened to five items, as it had been included in a larger survey with several other instruments. The five items each represent one dimension of trust, as definedby Hall et al (2001).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Dimensions of trust include, fidelity, honesty, and competence. 31 Insofar as the competence dimension of trust refers to communication skills that enhance technical aspects of care, participants made qualitative distinctions between modes of delivery. Younger participants preferred the speedy and 'hasslefree' experience of some express delivery establishments.…”
Section: Mapping Interview Findings Onto the Policy Terrainmentioning
confidence: 99%