2006
DOI: 10.1007/s10804-007-9026-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Trust, Identity, and Ego Integrity: Modeling Erikson’s Core Stages Over 34 Years

Abstract: Erikson's core stages (trust, identity, and ego integrity) were modeled over 34 years from college through the late 1950s among 175 men and women tested on the Inventory of Psychosocial Development (Constantinople, Dev Psychol 1: [357][358][359][360][361][362][363][364][365][366][367][368][369][370][371][372] 1969) testing the hypothesis that each, although united by the theme of wholeness and continuity, would show distinct developmental trajectories. Stage 1 (Trust versus Mistrust) followed a positive linea… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Also, it is possible that the characteristics associated with Integrity resolution are developed before the ages studied. Both Hannah et al (1996) and Sneed et al (2006) found evidence that resolution of earlier psychosocial stages predicted resolution of later ones. Our participants, themselves, seemed to think that the accumulation of understanding was gradual, with a notable increase, especially in honesty, around age fifty.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, it is possible that the characteristics associated with Integrity resolution are developed before the ages studied. Both Hannah et al (1996) and Sneed et al (2006) found evidence that resolution of earlier psychosocial stages predicted resolution of later ones. Our participants, themselves, seemed to think that the accumulation of understanding was gradual, with a notable increase, especially in honesty, around age fifty.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, most cross-sectional studies did not find differences according to age (Hannah et al, 1996;Ryff & Heincke, 1983;Webster, 2003;see however, Domino & Affonso, 1990). The longitudinal Rochester study also did not find evidence of an increase with age (Sneed, Whitbourne & Culang, 2006;Whitbourne, Sneed, & Sayer, 2009). Hence, ego integrity and despair are more a matter of the resolution of previous dilemmas of human development than of chronological age.…”
mentioning
confidence: 87%
“…The result was a model in which people might be classified as having explored without commitment (moratorium), committed without exploring (foreclosure), explored and committed (achieved), or neither committed nor explored (diffuse). Later work suggested that developmental progressions from diffusion toward achievement were evident in late adolescence and early adulthood (Kroger, 2003, in press;Sneed, Whitbourne, & Culang, 2006;Waterman, 1982;Whitbourne, Sneed, & Skultety, 2002), although development within a status model was less linear and stagelike than the conceptual framework might imply (see, e.g., Kroger, in press). Recent meta-analyses by Kroger (reviewed in Kroger, in press) suggest a lot of room for further development in adulthood, consistent with Erikson's broader theorizing.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%