Trust-distrust balance: trust ambivalence in Sino-Western B2B relationships

Abstract

Purpose-This study explores how Chinese and Finnish managers in cross-cultural supply-chain relationships evaluate their business partners' trustworthiness and distrustworthiness. Design/methodology/approach-Representatives of two Finnish companies and their Chinese and Finnish suppliers were interviewed to collect qualitative data from 23 managers. Findings-The Chinese managers emphasized relationship-specific, personalized trustworthiness. They highlighted personalized communication and benevolence, which manifested in respect and reciprocity, rooted in the Chinese notion of "guanxi" as personal ties. In contrast, the Finnish managers' view of trustworthiness was more associated with depersonalized organizational attributes. They emphasized the dimension of integrity, especially promise-keeping. In addition, tentative signs of trust ambivalence, as a balance between trust-and distrust-related factors, were identified for both the Chinese and the Finns. Research limitations/implications-Due to the exploratory nature of this study the validity the findings is limited to this data and context. Future studies could explore other national contexts as well as the effects of industry, market position, and position in the supply chain. Practical implications-The findings of this study bring a valuable understanding of the potential pitfalls and unique challenges in cross-border inter-firm transactions. These can enhance inter-firm trust building in a cross-cultural context. Originality/value-This study enriches the view of trust as a holistic process of simultaneous evaluation of both trustworthiness and distrustworthiness. In this process, trust ambivalence could serve as the intermediate construct between trust and distrust. These two contrary yet complementary opposites constitute a duality to be managed from the perspective of yin-yang balancing.

The Multipurpose Application WeChat: A Review on Recent Research

“…Among these are concepts such as guānxì (, Chen et al, 2017), or personality dimensions going beyond the famous Big Five (Cheung et al, 1996, 2001). Guānxì, as a unique feature of Chinese society, consists of different aspects such as gǎnqíng (, affection), rénqíng (, favor), and xìnrèn (, trust) (Jukka et al, 2017). Recent studies have paid attention to the roles of different guānxì () dimensions exerting effects on the usage of social media (Chen et al, 2017; Davison et al, 2018).…”

Assessing Trust and Risk Perceptions in the Sharing Economy: An Empirical Study

“…Previous literature indicates that the trust in China is distinctive from the trust in Western countries due to different cultural value (Li, 2008; Lin et al, 2018). The personalized affective base of trust is more dominant in China because Chinese culture relatively centres on affect (sentiment) (Jukka et al, 2017; Li, 2007). Conversely, the depersonalized cognitive base of trust in the West is more prevalent because of the centrality of cognition (rationality) in Western cultures (Li, 2008).…”

The influence of cronyism on entrepreneurial resource acquisition

“…Chinese people commit to each other on a long-term basis through the hidden norm of reciprocity involving equity and exchanging favors (Luo & Chen, 1997). For instance, Li's (2017) research into China's military Fig. 2 Dimensions of guanxi and characteristics (Zhai, 2011: pp.…”