Trust, Distrust and Commitment

Hawley, Katherine

doi:10.1111/nous.12000

Cited by 245 publications

(179 citation statements)

References 25 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

154

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…In contrast, a compelling recent account of trust, due to Katharine Hawley (2012), locates the difference between trust and reliance in terms of 'commitments'. 9 According to Hawley, trusting someone is a matter of relying on them to meet their commitments, and trustworthiness is a matter of adjusting one's behaviour to one's commitments.…”

Section: Selfish Yet Other--regarding Motivationsmentioning

confidence: 94%

Trustworthiness and Motivations

Gold¹

2014

Capital Failure

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Selfish Yet Other--regarding Motivationsmentioning

confidence: 94%

Trustworthiness and Motivations

Gold¹

2014

Capital Failure

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Reliability is a property of machines and inanimate objects, where as trust occurs between conscious agents. For example, we rely on a shelf to hold books, but do we trust the shelf [39]? Fully-fledged trust seems to involve reliability and psychological components such as the ability to apologise if we let people down, if we fail to do as we said we would.…”

Section: Who or What Is Trustworthy?mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Our reasons to trust are based on evaluations of a general trustworthiness of an agent [24,[39][40][41]63]. After all, the boy who cried wolf was not trusted in the end because he had a history of false testimony even though he was correct in the final instance.…”

Section: Explicit Justifications Of Trustmentioning

confidence: 99%

Trustworthiness of Autonomous Systems

Devitt

2018

Foundations of Trusted Autonomy

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Of course, such a statement depends on how 'trust' is defined. Amongst the numerous delineations of the idea (see Introduction and Ryzhova, this volume), I have chosen to use that of the philosopher Katherine Hawley (2014) because it enables me to discuss the social outcomes of the difference between reliance (that something will happen as expected, that someone will do what they usually do) and trust, which involves gauging another's obligation, sincerity, or commitment. I shall suggest that breaches of this kind of trust generate emotional reactions that can be the springboard for public action.…”

Section: Trust and The Dogovor ('Agreement')mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The second is to suggest some ways in which these studies can contribute to understanding the import of trust and mistrust in small-scale economic activities. It should be added straight away that the book does not propose a theory of trust of its own to add to the numerous conceptualizations of this idea already available (Luhmann 1979;Gambetta 1988;Hosking 2010;Cook 2001; O'Neill 2002; Baier 2004;Hawley 2014). Rather, it provides anthropological ideas and ethnographic materials that will enable readers to explore and probe these models.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Trust and Mistrust in the Economies of the China-Russia Borderlands

2018

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Asian Borderlands presents the latest research on borderlands in Asia as well as on the borderlands of Asia -the regions linking Asia with Africa, Europe and Oceania. Its approach is broad: it covers the entire range of the social sciences and humanities. The series explores the social, cultural, geographic, economic and historical dimensions of border-making by states, local communities and flows of goods, people and ideas. It considers territorial borderlands at various scales (national as well as supra-and sub-national) and in various forms (land borders, maritime borders), but also presents research on social borderlands resulting from border-making that may not be territorially fixed, for example linguistic or diasporic communities. Creative Commons License CC BY NC ND (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0) Series EditorsThe authors / Amsterdam University Press B.V., Amsterdam 2018Some rights reserved. Without limiting the rights under copyright reserved above, any part of this book may be reproduced, stored in or introduced into a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means (electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise). Breeze ' development, Vladivostok, 2013 190 Figure 13 The 'Eastern Breeze ' complex, Vladivostok, 2013 191 Figure 14 Chinese buyers scrupulously explore an old Chinese object put on sale at Sotheby's auction house in London, UK 212 Figure 15 Carl Fabergé's Easter egg, made predominantly of jade from a private collection of Viktor Vekselberg, the fourth richest person in Russia. The object is on display at special private museum in Saint-Petersburg, Russia 215 Figure 16 One of the Sunshine's operations. Guards reload raw jade to transport it across a river. Jade is on its way from mine to warehouse 219 Figure 17 Advertisement for a company offering help with on-line purchases in Manzhouli, China 241 List of Figures IntroductionTrusting and Mistrusting Across Borders Caroline HumphreyThis book is a collection of essays based on recent fieldwork along the Northeast frontier between Russia and China, 1 and it has two main aims that are closely interconnected. The first is to explore how trust and mistrust are negotiated in a situation beset with doubts and misunderstandings, in a border region where previously hostile states with very different histories, cultures, and languages face one another. The second is to suggest some ways in which these studies can contribute to understanding the import of trust and mistrust in small-scale economic activities. It should be added straight away that the book does not propose a theory of trust of its own to add to the numerous conceptualizations of this idea already available (Luhmann 1979;Gambetta 1988;Hosking 2010;Cook 2001; O'Neill 2002; Baier 2004;Hawley 2014). Rather, it provides anthropological ideas and ethnographic materials that will enable readers to explore and probe these models. What is new here is that, while the great majority of theories of trust assume that actors have a common back...

show abstract

Trust, Distrust and Commitment

Cited by 245 publications

References 25 publications

Trustworthiness and Motivations

Trustworthiness and Motivations

Trustworthiness of Autonomous Systems

Trust and Mistrust in the Economies of the China-Russia Borderlands

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About