2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.advwatres.2021.104019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Trust and incentives for transboundary groundwater cooperation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This principle—known as the superposition principle—governs groundwater flows in confined aquifers. A comparable (though less tractable) game theoretical model based on an equivalent expression for (steady state) unconfined aquifers is discussed in (Penny, Mullen, et al., 2021; Penny, Müller‐Itten, et al., 2021).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…This principle—known as the superposition principle—governs groundwater flows in confined aquifers. A comparable (though less tractable) game theoretical model based on an equivalent expression for (steady state) unconfined aquifers is discussed in (Penny, Mullen, et al., 2021; Penny, Müller‐Itten, et al., 2021).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This allows parameters α i and β i to be respectively interpreted as the unit price of pumped groundwater volume and the unit cost of pumping energy. Because formal markets for water are rare, α i is often a shadow price to be determined using proxies, such as the cost of conveyance infrastructure (Müller et al., 2017), or the cost of obtaining water from an alternative source (Penny, Müller‐Itten, et al., 2021). The linear form of the utility function implies that (a) the cost of drilling and setting up the pumps is small compared to the life‐time (energy) costs of operating them, (b) the shadow price of water is exogenously given and not itself affected by groundwater production (see Dang et al., 2016), (c) systemic costs of decreased water levels beyond pumping cost externalities (e.g., decreased streamflow production (Sahu & McLaughlin, 2021)) are neglected and (d) water is the limiting factor of production.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The external agent is willing to pay an amount of money to the players to encourage them to cooperate. Penny et al (2021) examined how treaties can emerge between the players pumping from aquifers. The external player can be considered as the subject that offers the payment so that such a treaty is made possible.…”
Section: Formulation Of the Coalitional Gamementioning
confidence: 99%