Trust and Distrust: Cognitive Decisions or Social Relations?

Kjærnes, Unni

doi:10.1080/13669870601065577

Cited by 71 publications

(59 citation statements)

References 36 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Trust is an important component of health and wellbeing through its impact on food choice and confidence in expert advice (Coveney 2008). Moreover, in times where the consumer takes a less active role in the food cycle, information allowing transparency of production is important (Kjaernes 2006).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Workplace foodservice; perception of quality and trust

et al. 2016

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Workplace foodservice; perception of quality and trust

et al. 2016

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…The desire to avoid any unwanted impacts of the social environment appears at early stages of ontogenesis as a logical result of the basic trust with which a child is born (according to Erikson, 1963). If the crisis of "basic trust/mistrust" is not resolved in a timely and adequate manner, it can affect an individual in the future, taking the form of social mistrust in himself/herself, in other people or in the world (Kjaernes, 2006). The most significant signs of mistrust are immorality, unreliability, destructiveness, membership in a hostile social group, susceptibility to conflict, impoliteness, and withdrawn behavior, which almost inevitably entail a lack of initiative or a sense of responsibility, as well as the occurrence of feelings of injury, frustration and suspiciousness.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Risk factors related to antisocial behavior in teenagers with intellectual disabilities

Kislyakov¹

2017

Psych. Rus.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background. Throughout the ontogenic development period and life journey, everyone faces numerous threats and challenges. Certain of these challenges are beyond the individual's control and are caused by social and environmental factors, but others, conversely, are provoked by the individual's own lifestyle and mental and/or physical health condition. This paper considers how the social adaptation of children with intellectual developmental disorders affects the development of various forms of socially dangerous behavior.objective. The primary goal of the study described in the article is to identify and analyze the potential risk factors related to antisocial behavior among teenagers with intellectual disabilities (mental retardation) based on a survey of teachers in special (correctional) schools.The methodological basis of our research uses the provisions of Lev Vygotsky's theory of socialization among children with intellectual disabilities. This article shows the importance of implementing Lev Vygotsky's doctrine of correction and compensation of disturbed psychological, emotional and social development of schoolchildren with intellectual disabilities.design. To achieve this purpose, the following methods were used: interviews, questionnaires, and factor analysis. In the first stage of the study, interviews were conducted with teachers working in special (correctional) schools (teachers, child and youth counselors, school psychologists, developmental pediatricians) -of 108 teachers from 10 schools. Analysis of the interviews revealed a list of risk factors related to antisocial behavior among teenagers with intellectual disabilities (only 35 points). The collected data formed the basis for a questionnaire, "Social Safety for Children with Intellectual Disabilities". In the second stage, 83 teachers working in the special (correctional) schools were surveyed. The survey was completed by teachers of children (12-13 years old) who had a diagnosis of F70 (Mild mental retardation) or F71 (Moderate mental retardation). To determine the significance of risk factors, the respondents were asked to assess children's exposure to risk factors on a 5-point scale. In the third stage, the results of the risk factor assessment conducted in relation to socially dangerous behavior of adolescents with intellectual disabilities were processed using the factor analysis. P. A. KislyakovResults. From the factor analysis of the data collected, as well as an analysis of the relevant theoretical and methodological materials, the following risk factors (with load factors) of socially dangerous behavior among teenagers with intellectual disabilities were identified: antisocial behavior (violation of generally accepted societal norms) (48.7 %); asociality (the lack of motivation to engage in social interaction) (7.96 %); infantilism (5.9 %); social mistrust in the world (4.86 %); propensity for victimizing behavior (4.18 %); virtual addiction (3.98 %); and high self-concept discrepancies (3.14 %).conclusions. The results of our resear...

show abstract

“…Hohl and Gaskell (2008) describe a "North-South divide" in food risk concerns; residents of Northern European countries are significantly less likely to worry about food risks than residents of Southern countries. Additionally, institutional trust appears greater in Great Britain and Scandinavia than in Italy, Portugal, and Germany (Kjaernes 2006). Kjaernes et al (2007) suggest that cross-national differences cannot be explained by individual differences but instead point to differing norms and expectations shaped by institutionalized relations between the state, food producers, and consumers.…”

Section: Contextual Influences On Food Risk Concernsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Public Perceptions of Food-related Risks: A Cross-national Investigation of Individual and Contextual Influences

Meagher¹

2018

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Public concerns about food risks have grown in recent decades in response to many food-related scandals. Despite some evidence that risk concerns vary across societies and risk domains, these variations remain understudied. To address this gap, this paper conducts a multi-level analysis of public concerns about biological and chemical/technical food risks in 26 European countries. Findings confirm previous work on individual predictors of risk concern and suggest that several contextual factors contribute to cross-national variations: aggregate perceptions of risks as unnatural, retail concentration in the food sector, and media coverage. The effect of institutional trust on risk concerns varies substantially across nations. Findings also reveal important differences in public concerns about biological versus chemical/technical food risks, supporting the view that food risk perception is multi-dimensional and complex.

show abstract

Trust and Distrust: Cognitive Decisions or Social Relations?

Cited by 71 publications

References 36 publications

Workplace foodservice; perception of quality and trust

Workplace foodservice; perception of quality and trust

Risk factors related to antisocial behavior in teenagers with intellectual disabilities

Public Perceptions of Food-related Risks: A Cross-national Investigation of Individual and Contextual Influences

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About