1969
DOI: 10.1007/bf02920802
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Trunk contraction ofHevea brasiliensis due to tapping

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

1976
1976
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, it becomes higher than that at the 25 cm position after that indicating the importance of osmotic dilution and laticifer plugging in the latex flow and turgor pressure recovery 30 min after tapping. This result is consistent with dendrometric measurement of the rubber tree trunk diameter (Gooding 1952; Luštinec et al 1969) and bark contraction (Southorn 1967) at different distance below the tapping cut. It confirmed the newly developed PTPP could sensitively measure the quick change of the H. brasiliensis phloem turgor pressure which is an indication of the latex flow and phloem water relationship after tapping.
Figure 7 Phloem turgor pressure variation at 5 cm and 25 cm beneath the tapping cut during latex flow.
…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 88%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…However, it becomes higher than that at the 25 cm position after that indicating the importance of osmotic dilution and laticifer plugging in the latex flow and turgor pressure recovery 30 min after tapping. This result is consistent with dendrometric measurement of the rubber tree trunk diameter (Gooding 1952; Luštinec et al 1969) and bark contraction (Southorn 1967) at different distance below the tapping cut. It confirmed the newly developed PTPP could sensitively measure the quick change of the H. brasiliensis phloem turgor pressure which is an indication of the latex flow and phloem water relationship after tapping.
Figure 7 Phloem turgor pressure variation at 5 cm and 25 cm beneath the tapping cut during latex flow.
…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 88%
“…It could sensitively measure the rapid alteration of phloem turgor pressure for several hours (Figures 3, 4, 5, 6 and 7; Additional files 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5), and in accordance with tapping and daily transpiration induced trunk diameter (Gooding 1952; Luštinec et al 1969) and bark contraction (Southorn 1967). Therefore, the novel phloem turgor pressure probe is a reliable technique to accurately measure the real-time phloem turgor pressure.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation