The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 9:30 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 1 hour.
2015
DOI: 10.1007/jhep05(2015)141
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Truncation effects in the functional renormalization group study of spontaneous symmetry breaking

Abstract: Abstract:We study the occurrence of spontaneous symmetry breaking (SSB) for O(N ) models using functional renormalization group techniques. We show that even the local potential approximation (LPA) when treated exactly is sufficient to give qualitatively correct results for systems with continuous symmetry, in agreement with the Mermin-Wagner theorem and its extension to systems with fractional dimensions. For general N (including the Ising model N = 1) we study the solutions of the LPA equations for various t… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
25
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
2
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Note that this definition is compatible with usual truncations in the symmetric phase, that is with derivative and mean field expansion considered in the literature [84]- [85]. Moreover, in non-symmetric phase, a dependence of Z(s) on the means fields M andM is expected.…”
Section: Definition 25supporting
confidence: 70%
“…Note that this definition is compatible with usual truncations in the symmetric phase, that is with derivative and mean field expansion considered in the literature [84]- [85]. Moreover, in non-symmetric phase, a dependence of Z(s) on the means fields M andM is expected.…”
Section: Definition 25supporting
confidence: 70%
“…However, our conclusions are based on the behavior of the effective potential rather than on a specific value of a physically relevant quantity as a critical exponent. We thus expect them to be solid with respect to this issue [ 62 , 63 , 64 , 72 , 72 ].…”
Section: Concluding Remarks and Open Issuesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We get β m (p) = 0 = β 41 (p) = 0. Then the constraint (79) implies that at the point p we get ηλ 41 1 −λ 41 π 2 (1 +m 2 ) 2 (p) = 0.…”
Section: Convenient Search Of the Ward Identitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%