2021
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2104.06342
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Truncation effects in the charge representation of the O(2) model

Jin Zhang,
Yannick Meurice,
Shan-Wen Tsai

Abstract: The O(2) model in Euclidean space-time is the zero-gauge-coupling limit of the compact scalar quantum electrodynamics. We obtain a dual representation of it called the charge representation. We study the quantum phase transition in the charge representation with a truncation to "spin S", where the quantum numbers have an absolute value less or equal to S. The charge representation preserves the gapless-to-gapped phase transition even for the smallest spin truncation S = 1. The phase transition for S = 1 is an … Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 83 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, this exponent should be the same as the power-law scaling of β p of χ M in a weak external field for all clock models with integer q ≥ 5, where there is always an emergent O(2) symmetry [40,62]. In the limit of O(2) model, this exponent is found to be around 0.162 [63][64][65].…”
Section: Large-β Peak: Ising Criticalitymentioning
confidence: 88%
“…However, this exponent should be the same as the power-law scaling of β p of χ M in a weak external field for all clock models with integer q ≥ 5, where there is always an emergent O(2) symmetry [40,62]. In the limit of O(2) model, this exponent is found to be around 0.162 [63][64][65].…”
Section: Large-β Peak: Ising Criticalitymentioning
confidence: 88%
“…s ≈ 1, a truncation of n max = 2 appears to be sufficient. One key feature that is evident is that there seems to be a stark difference between the spin-1 and spin-2 truncation at all couplings; this was seen as well in [81]. The discrepancy is not unexpected, for Z n theories there is a marked discrepancy between n ≤ 4 and n ≥ 5 accurate representations of U (1) [82].…”
Section: Systematic Errorsmentioning
confidence: 91%