Trump’s Cultural Populism

Goodheart, Eugene

doi:10.1007/s12115-017-0207-9

Cited by 4 publications

(4 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Several political scientists have suggested that the victory of Donald Trump changed the sociopolitical climate (Goodheart, ) including shifts in social norms dictating interpersonal interactions (Crandall, Miller, & White, ). The term “sociopolitical” refers to the interaction of social and political factors: just as social norms influence political structures, so too can politics influence social norms and systems (Bursztyn, Egorov, & Fiorin, ).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Marginalized Identities, Trump‐Related Distress, and the Mental Health of Underrepresented College Students

Albright

Hurd

2019

American J of Comm Psychol

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Marginalized Identities, Trump‐Related Distress, and the Mental Health of Underrepresented College Students

Albright

Hurd

2019

American J of Comm Psychol

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Using Poynting (2013) and Huber et al (2008) as points of departure, their perspectives around racism correspond to the research argument. It can be argued racism nowadays in the age of Trumpian subjectivism (Goodheart, 2018), white supremacy (Vieten and Poynting, 2016) and far-right populism is based on ‘cultural differences’ (Carr, 2011) and entrenched in biological superiorities. It happens while bearing in mind that in Britain, a report ‘argues anti-Muslim prejudice has replaced immigration as the key driver of the growth of the far right’ (Perraudin, 2019: para.…”

Section: Literature Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

Rethinking political PR: A theoretical framework towards supporting social integration in the UK

Okour

2022

Public Relations Inquiry

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Political, social and demographic change has resulted in a search for new techniques for building public trust and reconciling relationships between the Muslim community and others in society. In this study, extremism and social cohesion have been chosen as potential new aims for the PR industry. This study assesses whether political PR can be diverted from its role in spin doctoring towards new cultural and social functions. My argument is that political PR can be used as a tool for social integration with particular reference to the Muslim community in the UK. This research distinguishes between two issues. The first connects with political PR within a political communication background, which relates to politicians, election campaigns, news management and their relationship with the media. The second issue is that political PR can be reconsidered from a corporate perspective, one that endorses the use of PR in challenging political environments. My study places emphasis on the second issue. A sample of seven UK PR academics, therefore, evaluated the current communication policies for their effectiveness, explained how political PR could help and gave their recommendations. Seven NGOs in Britain also described their work, the problems they encountered and their concerns. A lack of social integration and the rise of extremism were explained in terms of stereotyping, marginalisation and counterproductive techniques. The results suggest that a change in political PR is possible and should be encouraged to intervene in countering radicalization and enhancing social cohesion. They also show a lack of PR support for NGOs. The findings broadly move the field of inclusivity forward by working on a bottom-up approach instead of a top-down model of communication. The best answer for sustaining long-term community relationships was improved communication and engagement, inclusive messages and campaigns, and the Muslim community remaining open to others in society.

show abstract

“…What he believes is right, anything and anyone who contradicts him is wrong. Goodheart claims that "Trump's truth is all about himself in contrast to the fake truth of the media and the scientific hoax of global warming" (Goodheart, 2018).…”

Section: Anti-elite / Anti Establishment and Narcissist Behaviourmentioning

confidence: 99%

Populism in the United States: Binary Constructions by Donald Trump in the Domestic and Foreign Policies

Mirza

Ali

Qaisrani

2021

GSSR

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This study intends to explore the rise of Donald Trump to the White House. Why was Donald Trump considered a populist leader, and how did his populist rhetoric and actions impact the contours of American domestic and foreign policies? The study adopted qualitative exploratory and explanatory research techniques. Specific methods utilised to conduct the study remained political personality profiling. It finds that the populist leaders construct the binaries in the society by dividing the nation into two groups: �us� the people, against �them� the corrupt elite or other groups presented as a threat to the lives and livelihood of the nation. Though populism as a unique brand of politics remained active through most of the US history, yet these were only two occasions that populists were successful in winning the American presidential elections � Andrew Jackson in 1828 and Donald Trump in 2016. Structural and historical reasons became the biggest cause behind the election of Donald Trump, who successfully brought a revolution in American domestic and foreign policies. And if structural issues in the United States are not addressed, there is a clear chance that Trump � who is not withering away � will come back to contest and challenge any competitors in the 2024 presidential elections.

show abstract

Trump’s Cultural Populism

Cited by 4 publications

References 0 publications

Marginalized Identities, Trump‐Related Distress, and the Mental Health of Underrepresented College Students

Marginalized Identities, Trump‐Related Distress, and the Mental Health of Underrepresented College Students

Rethinking political PR: A theoretical framework towards supporting social integration in the UK

Populism in the United States: Binary Constructions by Donald Trump in the Domestic and Foreign Policies

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About