2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.electstud.2017.07.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Truman defeats Dewey: The effect of campaign visits on election outcomes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In presidential election years, some scholars point to the positive mobilization effect of presidential campaign visits (Cann and Cole 2011; Heersink and Peterson 2017; Hill and McKee 2005; West 1983), while others highlight the lack of any substantial mobilization effect (Herr 2002; Holbrook and McClurg 2005). Some studies have found evidence that presidential visits can raise turnout in midterm elections as well (Cohen, Krassa, and Hamman 1991; Mellen and Searles 2013a).…”
Section: Impact Of Presidential Campaigning On Voting Behavior and Elmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In presidential election years, some scholars point to the positive mobilization effect of presidential campaign visits (Cann and Cole 2011; Heersink and Peterson 2017; Hill and McKee 2005; West 1983), while others highlight the lack of any substantial mobilization effect (Herr 2002; Holbrook and McClurg 2005). Some studies have found evidence that presidential visits can raise turnout in midterm elections as well (Cohen, Krassa, and Hamman 1991; Mellen and Searles 2013a).…”
Section: Impact Of Presidential Campaigning On Voting Behavior and Elmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The evidence from existing studies is mixed overall. For example, Heersink and Peterson (2017) using county-level election results from 1948 find that Truman's vote-share was significantly higher where he made campaign visits, but the same was not true for Dewey. Jones (1998), Althaus, Nardulli and Shaw (2002) and Gerber et al (2011) study campaign visits and advertisements during presidential elections from 1972 to 2000 and conclude that the visits had a significant impact on the vote.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The evidence from existing studies is mixed overall. For example, Heersink and Peterson (2017) using county-level election results from 1948 find that Truman's vote-share was significantly higher where he made campaign visits, but the same was not true for Dewey. Jones (1998), Althaus, Nardulli and Shaw (2002) and Gerber et al (2011) study campaign visits and advertisements during presidential elections from 1972 to 2000 and conclude that the visits had a significant impact on the vote.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%