2014
DOI: 10.1145/2601097.2601128
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

True2Form

Abstract: True2Form is a sketch-based modeling system that reconstructs 3D curves from typical design sketches. Our approach to infer 3D form from 2D drawings is a novel mathematical framework of insights derived from perception and design literature. We note that designers favor viewpoints that maximally reveal 3D shape information, and strategically sketch descriptive curves that convey intrinsic shape properties, such as curvature, symmetry, or parallelism. Studies indicate that viewers apply these proper… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
15
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 123 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
2
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This new goal brings us to prior work in the area of sketch-based modeling, where a number of methods relied on the analysis of complex sketches to infer a 3D shape or a 2.5D high relief from a single sketch, e.g., [Cordier and Seo 2007;Karpenko and Hughes 2006;Xu et al 2014;Yeh et al 2017]. Most methods in the area built on a priori knowledge (or contextual information) in order to resolve ambiguities -such as requiring exact symmetric shapes [Cordier et al 2011], being restricted to garments [Turquin et al 2007] or to side views of animals [Entem et al 2014] or requesting 3D information such as a 3D skeleton from the user [Bessmeltsev et al 2015].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This new goal brings us to prior work in the area of sketch-based modeling, where a number of methods relied on the analysis of complex sketches to infer a 3D shape or a 2.5D high relief from a single sketch, e.g., [Cordier and Seo 2007;Karpenko and Hughes 2006;Xu et al 2014;Yeh et al 2017]. Most methods in the area built on a priori knowledge (or contextual information) in order to resolve ambiguities -such as requiring exact symmetric shapes [Cordier et al 2011], being restricted to garments [Turquin et al 2007] or to side views of animals [Entem et al 2014] or requesting 3D information such as a 3D skeleton from the user [Bessmeltsev et al 2015].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Photographs have also been used in conjunction with sketches to disambiguate form [Lau et al 2010]. Xu et al [2014] infer 3D curve networks from a given 2D sketched design by assuming implied regularities, such as planarity, curvature, symmetry, and parallelism. In contrast, we target our system at freeform space curves which may or may not directly participate in defining some underlying surface.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One way to make drawing in 3D easier is to impose assumptions about the underlying form, such as regularity, symmetry, planarity, and orthogonality [Bae et al 2008;Kara and Shimada 2007;Schmidt et al 2009b;Xu et al 2014]. While these approaches work well in practice they are often restricted to a certain class of shapes, which may limit artistic expressiveness.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A large body of research deals with interpreting a collection of 2D strokes as a 3D object represented using a network of 3D curves. Tools such as ILoveSketch [3], True2Form [46], and analytic 3D drawing [1], infer 3D from 2D using a mix of regularity constraints that define geometric relationships between the curves in 3D. Curves are often inferred as cleanly drawn 2D strokes projected onto appropriate 3D planes in these approaches.…”
Section: Sketching In 3dmentioning
confidence: 99%